Trash can separator - modification for 2 input ports?

  • Advertise with us

« back to Focus on the Workspace forum

Forum topic by jimmyhopps posted 09-04-2014 03:29 AM 730 views 0 times favorited 2 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View jimmyhopps's profile


217 posts in 1801 days

09-04-2014 03:29 AM

Hi. Wondering if anyone has modified a trash can separator lid to accommodate a 2nd input hose? I’m thinking of:

A) cutting a new hole in the lid and gluing in a blast gate on top, and gluing in a 45 or 90 degree corner on the inside of the lid and
B) cutting down the exiting input port on the outside of the lid (the one on the right of the picture) and gluing in another blast gate. This would shorten it and i think make it slightly more streamlined.

By doing this, i could attach a hose for other purposes (eg vacuuming the shop, connect to my sander) without any hassle. I suppose i could also buy some quick connect attachments for both input hoses and skip the new port, but that would be a few more bucks.

2 replies so far

View DIYaholic's profile


19140 posts in 2097 days

#1 posted 09-04-2014 10:06 PM

I would just add a “Y” onto the input, with two blast gates. I would fear that adding an additional inlet would jeopardize proper air flow in the collection can. That and it would be a lot more work.

-- Randy-- I may not be good...but I am slow! If good things come to those who wait.... Why is procrastination a bad thing?

View jimmyhopps's profile


217 posts in 1801 days

#2 posted 09-05-2014 08:15 PM

This may seem a silly concern, but the Y adds another 10” or so of vertical to the main intake hoses. and my hose from the table saw is barely reaching the can spot anyway. The other issue is that to connect blast gates to the Y you need short pieces of hose which are flexible which in turn makes this connection even higher and quite floppy. the alternative to that last issue is to epoxy the blast gates to the Y so it has a rigid connection.

I’m curious if people have a view on any inefficiencies that a 2nd port may cause? my guess was there isn’t much incremental inefficiency. I was thinking of putting the 2nd port facing the same general counterclockwise direction as the original port, but either pointing slightly more to the outside or inside so it doesn’t blow right into the back of the original port.

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics