LumberJocks

Questions about Stanley 93

  • Advertise with us

« back to Hand Tools forum

Forum topic by ScottStewart posted 03-11-2014 01:50 AM 498 views 0 times favorited 11 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View ScottStewart's profile

ScottStewart

111 posts in 818 days


03-11-2014 01:50 AM

I am debating getting a shoulder plane, and my main options seem to be the LV shoulder and the Stanley 93. Blood and Gore seems to imply that there are a lot of things that can go wrong with the 93 and caveat emptor.

Anyone use the 93?, like it, hate it, watch our for this? I am looking at one from one of the reputable online tool sellers. All opinions appreciated.

Thanks,

Scott


11 replies so far

View woodchuckerNJ's profile

woodchuckerNJ

886 posts in 320 days


#1 posted 03-11-2014 01:53 AM

Just my opinion, the LV planes are worth the money.
They are modern, smartly designed..

The quality is far superior to Stanley.

-- Jeff NJ

View PaulJerome's profile

PaulJerome

50 posts in 1719 days


#2 posted 03-11-2014 01:24 PM

There’s also the LN which is excellent. I purchased the LV and haven’t looked back. Great tool. Finely machined and works like you’d expect.

-- Paul, Central Illinois

View sikrap's profile

sikrap

1032 posts in 2045 days


#3 posted 03-11-2014 01:43 PM

I think that if you’re talking about the new Stanley 93’s, you would definitely be better off with LV, LN, or Clifton. Personally, I like the old Stanleys, but they are over $100, so you’d probably be better off going for the Lee Valley, especially since the vintage planes will need some work.

-- Dave, Colonie, NY

View WayneC's profile

WayneC

12292 posts in 2783 days


#4 posted 03-11-2014 02:35 PM

+1 for LV or LN…

-- We must guard our enthusiasm as we would our life - James Krenov

View Kaleb the Swede's profile

Kaleb the Swede

1208 posts in 655 days


#5 posted 03-11-2014 02:45 PM

Maybe because I have never tried the Lie Nielsons but my new 93 that I got for my birthday a few months back has come into great use. I have used it to clean tenon shoulders, chisel planing off glue spots, making grooves and dados a little deeper. It has been a really good plane to have. Like I said I have never used a Lie Nielson and I have heard they are great, but don’t discount the 93.

-- Just trying to build something beautiful

View rad457's profile

rad457

203 posts in 492 days


#6 posted 03-11-2014 03:34 PM

Just got the LN Medium size and very impressed! More comfortable and on the hands than LV version.

-- Andre of Alberta. Are you Kidding me?

View Vincent Nocito's profile

Vincent Nocito

442 posts in 2050 days


#7 posted 03-11-2014 03:36 PM

I use old Stanley 90, 93 and 93 planes. Keep the blades sharp and properly adjusted and they work fine. You might want to check ebay for old ones or perhaps a Clifton or Record. Personally, I would avoid the new Sweetheart Stanley 92 and go for an oldie instead. Even the Wood River 92 (Woodcraft modeled after the old Preston planes) is pretty decent.

View JayT's profile (online now)

JayT

2390 posts in 897 days


#8 posted 03-11-2014 03:52 PM

Kaleb, you got a new 93? I didn’t think Stanley was making a 93 any more, just the 92.

I have a new 92 and would also say to avoid it. On the one I got, the bed for the iron was not square to the sole or the sides. Apparently, it is a common problem with the new 92’s. As much as I like vintage planes, this is one case where I think a new medium LV or LN shoulder plane would be worth it—they are not much more than a vintage 93, but you are getting something machined square and a good company to back it up if there is an issue.

-- "The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money." Alexis de Tocqueville, 1835

View WhoMe's profile

WhoMe

1120 posts in 1930 days


#9 posted 03-11-2014 03:53 PM

Yep, avoid the new Stanley. All of them have sharp edges where the hands go, which requires work to smooth.
Once I learned how to use mine, I found that no matter what I do, the blade does not make an even cut. Bottom is square to the sides, blade is square, so, I save concluded that the bedding for the blade is most likely off. Not an easy fix.
It also rusts easily, even with a light coat of oil on it when I put it away.

Go for the LN or LV.

-- I'm not clumsy.. It's just the floor hates me, the tables and chairs are bullies and the wall gets in the way.. - Mike -

View theoldfart's profile

theoldfart

4464 posts in 1137 days


#10 posted 03-11-2014 04:35 PM

I have the LN medium and it works superbly. Would not hesitate to recommend it.

-- "Aged flatus, I heard that some one has already blown out your mortise." THE Surgeon ……………………………………. Kevin

View Loren's profile

Loren

7724 posts in 2334 days


#11 posted 03-11-2014 04:47 PM

I had a 92 or 93, I don’t remember which. After I got a
4lb. Record 073 I couldn’t get rid of the Stanley fast enough.

This was a long time ago, before the new crop of high-end
shoulder planes. I’ve read that old Record and Clifton shoulder
planes have variable quality but my Record is satisfactory.

My position on a shoulder plane for general furniture work
is it should be on the heavy side. The mass helps keep the
iron engaged in chatter-prone end grain cuts. For
small things you may find a small shoulder plane is good.

I like the way the knob turns sideways on the Lee Valley
models.

-- http://lawoodworking.com

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

GardenTenders.com :: gardening showcase