Woodpeckers precision woodworking square or T-square?

  • Advertise with us

« back to Hand Tools forum

Forum topic by AUBrian posted 02-10-2014 04:58 PM 7110 views 0 times favorited 17 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View AUBrian's profile


86 posts in 2693 days

02-10-2014 04:58 PM

Topic tags/keywords: woodpeckers t-square square

The title says it all. I’m looking to increase my precision, and am looking for a better tool for my marking. I’m down to the woodworking square and the t-square, and I don’t understand what benefit the woodworking square has over the T to justify the additional $30. Anyone have experience with both that can help out?

17 replies so far

View Woodknack's profile


11763 posts in 2402 days

#1 posted 02-10-2014 05:24 PM

You mean the carpenter’s square which has a 45° angle vs the t-square which has parallel edges? Seems to me they have different uses. I don’t use a t-square in my shop but I have several angle squares, very handy.

-- Rick M,

View rjpat's profile


43 posts in 2000 days

#2 posted 02-10-2014 05:46 PM

The T square is longer but the regular square is more versatile, so it depends on how you want to use it. The T square is more for layout work, while the square (try square) is more for checking to see if you cut or edges are square.

View Tedstor's profile


1643 posts in 2655 days

#3 posted 02-10-2014 06:23 PM

I’d get the woodworking square (If I were buying woodpeckers), then buy a $20 T-square from an office supply store.

View Loren's profile


10476 posts in 3670 days

#4 posted 02-10-2014 06:29 PM

... depends on the type of work you do.

I use a Woodpecker’s metric T-square for cabinet
layout but that’s because the hardware is designed
for metric.

View AUBrian's profile


86 posts in 2693 days

#5 posted 02-10-2014 08:39 PM

Rick, I have the triangle set – the 6.25” and 4.5” combo pack. I’m looking at the 12” T-square and the 1281

I already have several t-squares, that have varying degrees of squareness, but I’m tired of checking square everytime I pick up a tool – and even then not trusting it. I want something that I know is square and will stay that way.

For how I will use it (Layout for smaller pieces primarily) it seems like both tools would serve the same purpose…

View Ocelot's profile


1980 posts in 2660 days

#6 posted 02-10-2014 11:21 PM

The Woodpeckers square looks very nice, but is pricy and perhaps larger than needed.

I have the 7” Incra “Guaranteed Square”, and use it to set up machines and check squareness. I have used it for marking, but prefer to save it for checking squareness.

If I had not already the Incra square, I think I would buy a steel “engineers” square – probably from PEC tools. There are several similar imported squares from Grizzly and on Amazaon and Ebay etc. For about $20, you can get a square that is very accurate and fine for setting up machines. You could use it for marking too, but it has no rule markings on it.

Lately, for marking, I have the PEC Tools 6” double square, which, in spite of having a sliding head, is specified as accurate within 0.001” and is not detectably less square than my Incra square, and is a handy pocketable size. Frequently, however it is a little short.

It has very sharp markings down to 64ths.

These are available on Amazon – were $35, but now are $45. sells the exact same square described as a “second” (cosmetic) for only $21.50, but does not reveal that it is made by PEC tools.

View Tedstor's profile


1643 posts in 2655 days

#7 posted 02-11-2014 12:34 AM

Thanks for posting the Garret Wade deal. I’m in for one. Looks like a fine square. And I won’t need a stiff drink if I drop it.

View Lewis Landry's profile

Lewis Landry

13 posts in 1635 days

#8 posted 02-11-2014 03:12 AM

I have a variety of plastic drafting squares from little to big. Have found them perfectly square. Drafting “T” squares, on the other hand are another story. One wacky, or trip to the floor, and they are toast.

View DKV's profile


3940 posts in 2526 days

#9 posted 02-11-2014 04:35 AM

These have worked for me for the last 10 years.

-- This is a Troll Free zone.

View Ocelot's profile


1980 posts in 2660 days

#10 posted 02-11-2014 03:13 PM


I see you have the Incra too. Who made the others?

I also have an 18” combo square (Empire, I think) and a smaller one – look a lot like yours. I never assumed they were very accurate, but recently checked them and found them to be pretty good.


View brtech's profile


1029 posts in 2944 days

#11 posted 02-11-2014 03:33 PM

I think you will find that the T square is a bit better for layout, but the woodworker square is more versatile for things beyond layout, and does the layout task well enough that if you are choosing, get the woodworker’s square.

I’m a sucker for measurement and layout tools. I have the 6” one piece woodpecker’s square, a (used) Starrett combo square, a Lee Valley 4” double square and a couple of Swanson folding squares I picked up on sale. They all get used. I really, really like the double square and the Woodpeck square. They are my go-to tools for most layout tasks. The combo square comes out when the adjustability is needed, or the extra 12 inches are needed.

View Woodknack's profile


11763 posts in 2402 days

#12 posted 02-11-2014 06:46 PM

I’ve been eyeballing the Incra: 12” T-Rule, Protractor, & centering ruler. Just wasn’t sure how much use I would get from the T-rule. The centering ruler is something I’ve wanted for a long time.

-- Rick M,

View oldnovice's profile


6895 posts in 3390 days

#13 posted 02-11-2014 09:43 PM

Rick, do you really need a centering rule?
There are sooo many way to find the center without a rule just for that purpose.

-- "I never met a board I didn't like!"

View Woodknack's profile


11763 posts in 2402 days

#14 posted 02-12-2014 01:35 AM

I know, I’ve been using all those methods for years :)

But in the last year I’ve decided I’m tired of workarounds and have been buying or making more tools.

-- Rick M,

View ColonelTravis's profile


1797 posts in 1916 days

#15 posted 02-12-2014 05:03 AM

I’ve bought several things from Woodpecker because their quality is impeccable, I’ve met the owners, they’re nice, big fan of their standards. If money were no object I’d fill my garage with Woodpecker stuff but there are cheaper, reliable alternatives out there. I almost bought the Woodpecker WW square a few months ago, could not pull the trigger on that price. That said, AUBrian, if you get it you won’t be disappointed in the workmanship. I think I’ve seen the 24” T-square in a few Wood Whisperer videos.

showing 1 through 15 of 17 replies

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics