LumberJocks

Plane blade thickness

  • Advertise with us

« back to Hand Tools forum

Forum topic by alohafromberkeley posted 11-17-2013 11:02 PM 518 views 0 times favorited 2 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View alohafromberkeley's profile

alohafromberkeley

248 posts in 1070 days


11-17-2013 11:02 PM

Topic tags/keywords: plane blade

Aloha, I have a friend who was showing me his 1990’s Record/Marples #4 bought from Garrett Wade in 1994.It has the knurled lever cap (Is this a contradiction?) and not the lever style cap.We took the blade out and there are no identifying marking anywhere on the blade.There is a distinct bluing (tempering?) on the blade that goes through the round part of the slot on the bevel side. Looking at it from the side, I can see a distinct lamination line the length of the blade. I happened to have a Hock blade (O1) on hand and both blades are the same thickness which surprised me. My friend assured me that the plane has been in a box since 1996 and he had no aftermarket blade installed. Can anyone educate me this: Did R/M planes all come with lam blades and were they all as thick as Hock O1 blades? Also, why are there no markings on this blade (or was this a Garrett Wade upgrade) Any light on the subject- I’ve looked on UKForums, Cianperez, Record Planes and a fistful of sites that I can’t remember now .

-- "After a year of doing general farmwork, it was quite clear to me that chickens and I were not compatible"-George Nakashima


2 replies so far

View paratrooper34's profile

paratrooper34

760 posts in 1618 days


#1 posted 11-18-2013 02:14 AM

I own seven Record bench planes and not one of them has an unmarked blade. I have looked at an awful lot of Record planes and same goes for all of those; never saw one without markings on the blade. The lever cap you describe is not common for a Record, but some models definitely had them. My #7 has the same type cap.

I just went to check my planes for you to help find an answer. I have a couple of Hock O1 blades so I took one from a #5 and matched it up to my Records. It is thicker than the stock blades from #s 3, 4, 4 1/2, and 5. However, it was the same thickness as a #7 and 8. I see no lamination lines in any of the Record blades. My guess is you have a non-Record blade. Beyond that, I have no idea what you have.

I only have one that is a Record/Marples; a #4. Same goes for that blade also.

-- Mike

View alohafromberkeley's profile

alohafromberkeley

248 posts in 1070 days


#2 posted 11-18-2013 04:30 AM

Mike , thanks for the info. Yeah, it’s got me scratching my head.Everything on the plane seems stock except the blade. I wonder if somehow some guy at Garrett Wade switched out the blade.I’m trying to track down a GW 1994/1995 catalog to see if there are any clues in there. My friend only owns a block and the R/M #4 plane. So, it’s not like he got his blades mixed up at some point. Every R/M I’ve seen also has a stamp on the top of the cutter. According to my reading on the subject, some of the older Records and Stanleys had lam blades for a short time. Oh, well, I’ll keep on googling.

-- "After a year of doing general farmwork, it was quite clear to me that chickens and I were not compatible"-George Nakashima

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

GardenTenders.com :: gardening showcase