LumberJocks

Joints for workbench legs

  • Advertise with us

« back to Joinery forum

Forum topic by Marty5965 posted 486 days ago 1044 views 0 times favorited 4 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View Marty5965's profile

Marty5965

158 posts in 570 days


486 days ago

Topic tags/keywords: workbench joints mt bridle

Hi guys ( and Gals, of course),

I am building my workbench and am beginning my base build using 4×4 DF. My design has a modified H frame at either end with a trestle base and full width bearer on the top ( see blog for pics/plans).

Originally I was going with MT the legs into the bearer and trestle but as I was laying out I suddenly thought that Bridle joints would give me more glueing surface and therefore, potentially, more strength. I would draw bore/pin them just like a MT.

Anyone have any thoughts on this mod?

Thanks.

-- Marty, Columbus, OH, learning every day....


4 replies so far

View BTimmons's profile

BTimmons

2104 posts in 1110 days


#1 posted 485 days ago

I’ve followed along with who knows how many workbench builds on this site. A fair number of them drawbored their legs without the need for any glue. When done right, it seems that the joint pulls itself together so well that it doesn’t need any other help. Then it also has the advantage of being able to knock it down in case the bench has to be disassembled and moved.

-- Brian Timmons - http://www.BigTWoodworks.com

View Marty5965's profile

Marty5965

158 posts in 570 days


#2 posted 485 days ago

Hey Brian, thanks for the comment. So, given that there is more wood-to-wood contact in a bridle joint than a MT, it would seem logical that the bridal would be the stronger joint, wouldn’t you think?

-- Marty, Columbus, OH, learning every day....

View BTimmons's profile

BTimmons

2104 posts in 1110 days


#3 posted 485 days ago

I’m not really sure. Both of them will be very rigid if done properly. By that I mean either no gaps in the bridle joint or nice long tenons with a tight fit. It might get into a question of diminishing returns.

Anyone else want to chip in? I’m only guessing here.

-- Brian Timmons - http://www.BigTWoodworks.com

View shampeon's profile

shampeon

1346 posts in 808 days


#4 posted 485 days ago

More gluing surface yes, but the real strength of a MT joint is in the shoulders. All things being equal, a properly sized MT joint will be stronger than a bridle joint. Through tenons would have more surface area still for glue, if you’re worried.

-- ian | "You can't stop what's coming. It ain't all waiting on you. That's vanity."

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

GardenTenders.com :: gardening showcase