LumberJocks

On Closing Dormant Threads...

  • Advertise with us

« back to LumberJocks.com Site Feedback forum

Forum topic by poopiekat posted 02-23-2013 09:45 PM 1134 views 1 time favorited 52 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View poopiekat's profile

poopiekat

3736 posts in 2487 days


02-23-2013 09:45 PM

Topic tags/keywords: question

I really don’t like it when somebody tries to add their own comment to a long-dead thread. When the last comment posted was 1755 days ago,e.g., it shows that either the subject was beat to death, or is just simply no longer relevant. Many of those who posted in the day are no longer monitoring. If somebody has a comment to make, they should start a fresh new thread, and let others participate anew. A dormant thread, say 30, 60 or 100 days old with no new activity, should be closed to new comments. Possibly it could be archived for viewing, just not accepting further comments. Anybody with me on this?

-- Einstein: "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift, and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift." I'm Poopiekat!!


52 replies so far

View Joe Lyddon's profile

Joe Lyddon

7950 posts in 2805 days


#1 posted 02-23-2013 09:48 PM

What if someone stumbles upon it and truly has a comment / question, etc. etc.?

They are just Out of Luck?

-- Have Fun! Joe Lyddon - Alta Loma, CA USA - Home: http://www.WoodworkStuff.net ... My Small Gallery: http://www.ncwoodworker.net/pp/showgallery.php?ppuser=1389&cat=500"

View Handtooler's profile

Handtooler

1135 posts in 885 days


#2 posted 02-23-2013 09:48 PM

That certainly sounds reasonable, but that’d be up to Ms Debbie to close it I would think.

-- Russell Pitner Hixson, TN 37343 bassboy40@msn.com

View Smitty_Cabinetshop's profile

Smitty_Cabinetshop

10378 posts in 1371 days


#3 posted 02-23-2013 09:55 PM

Sorry, PK, not with you on this one. New thread(s) would be a re-hash. If someone finds on older thread that is all they want to discuss, fine. How often does it happen, and what’s the downside?

-- Don't anthropomorphize your handplanes. They hate it when you do that. -- OldTools Archive

View joeyinsouthaustin's profile

joeyinsouthaustin

1286 posts in 825 days


#4 posted 02-23-2013 09:57 PM

I haven’t been a member of the forum as long as many, but it is still nice to see those threads pop up every now and then, like drifters who wander in and out of our lives… some of those can also be pretty annoying if they stick around too long in between visits. I think I am on the fence, leaning towards separating some how. Maybe a little pop up that prompts a new poster that “the thread they are about to post on is over such and such days old, do they really want to post, have you read all the replies, etc. etc”... in case someone misses how old it really is.

-- Who is John Galt?

View joeyinsouthaustin's profile

joeyinsouthaustin

1286 posts in 825 days


#5 posted 02-23-2013 10:08 PM

also, maybe just more sorting options, if that way you could view as is, and see the flow, or sort according to number of days posted etc>>

-- Who is John Galt?

View teejk's profile

teejk

1215 posts in 1437 days


#6 posted 02-23-2013 10:08 PM

trade-off Poopie…this thing is available on Google so somebody searching for advice might stumble on an old thread and ask more questions (or say thanks) and the old post gets revived.

Not saying “thanks” is a common complaint here. So is opening a new topic on something that was covered years ago. Just an observation but the regulars here can be a rather “testy” bunch (sometimes reminds me of the DMV).

The “snarky” comments about a new question on an old topic usually come from somebody associated with the old topic (usually with the “Jane you ignorant s##t” attitude). A cut-off on new posts might actually force some proper manners on a free message board. From time to time I see a topic gets “closed” (which I think means no further comments are allowed but the history is still available)?

View Clint Searl's profile

Clint Searl

1479 posts in 1114 days


#7 posted 02-23-2013 10:33 PM

I fail to see any problem, but then, I try not to obsess over such things.

-- Clint Searl....Ya can no more do what ya don't know how than ya can git back from where ya ain't been

View Manitario's profile

Manitario

2378 posts in 1636 days


#8 posted 02-23-2013 10:44 PM

Personally, I wish that more old threads would be revived or searched before “new” threads were started. I get tired of seeing the same topics rehashed when they’ve already been beat to death on older threads. I think that closing older topics to further questions/comments would just result in more repeating of the same topics over and over again…

-- Sometimes the creative process requires foul language. -- Charles Neil

View OnlyJustME's profile

OnlyJustME

1562 posts in 1129 days


#9 posted 02-23-2013 10:44 PM

I would agree a little bit on the normal forums. I like the idea of the pop up that Joey suggested. It’s hard for newer members to see where it says how old a thread is sometimes.
Where i agree whole heartedly is the Trade and Swap forum where i have seen quite a few times some one posts to a thread that is over a year old asking if the item is still for sale.

-- In the end, when your life flashes before your eyes, will you like what you see?

View ShaneA's profile

ShaneA

5452 posts in 1351 days


#10 posted 02-23-2013 10:54 PM

Sometimes I like to see a golden oldie pop up. I too wish more people would look through the site before asking the same question for the 12th time. It does seem that newer members sometimes pull up an old thread with an add on or follow up question, making it harder for them to get the info they seek. No big deal really, typically I just skim through for the stuff that catches my eye.

View dhazelton's profile

dhazelton

1282 posts in 1049 days


#11 posted 02-23-2013 10:55 PM

I arrived at this place because of a google inquiry I made to a specific product, and the thread was a bout a year old. I joined and the thread got bumped back up because I asked a question. It is what it is – if you don’t want to read something then I simply wouldn’t. I don’t think it’s poor etiquette on the part of the poster.

View Don W's profile

Don W

15572 posts in 1320 days


#12 posted 02-23-2013 10:56 PM

I would like a choice. For instance a thread about something for sale that’s sold could be closed, but a “how to” blog should stay open.

if it can only be one way or the other, than I rather it was like it is now.

-- Master hand plane hoarder. - http://timetestedtools.com

View DKV's profile

DKV

3194 posts in 1257 days


#13 posted 02-23-2013 10:59 PM

Gotta vote against you on this one poopie. Those threads contain a ton of woodworking info. I’d rather folks do research than open a new thread on the same old topic. Like, which tablesaw should I buy? What’s the difference between crosscut and rip? Should I keep my fingers away from the blade? Are there 12 inches in a foot? What’s a kerf? Should I use a saw or router when making dovetails? Yada, yada, yada…

-- Have fun and laugh alot. Life can end at any moment. You old guys out there know what I mean...

View b2rtch's profile

b2rtch

4351 posts in 1801 days


#14 posted 02-23-2013 11:03 PM

Why do you care?

-- Bert

View ShaneA's profile

ShaneA

5452 posts in 1351 days


#15 posted 02-23-2013 11:05 PM

An option to close a thread might be good thing. Like stated, if the item was sold, or if it has gone so far off the tracks w/no hope of coming back. But, not to close a thread simply because of elapsed time or age of thread.

showing 1 through 15 of 52 replies

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

GardenTenders.com :: gardening showcase