LumberJocks

Your favorite rule (the measuring kind)

  • Advertise with us

« back to Hand Tools forum

Forum topic by WoodWorkWarrior posted 665 days ago 1588 views 0 times favorited 53 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View WoodWorkWarrior's profile

WoodWorkWarrior

46 posts in 668 days


665 days ago

Topic tags/keywords: rule incra measure

Just curious to see what LJ users find to be their most useful rule. I tend to use my Incra 12” T-rule all the time. Having the built in square and being able to slide the rule along the edge of board giving nice straight parallel lines are why I use it the most.

-- Jason


53 replies so far

View lumberjoe's profile

lumberjoe

2824 posts in 844 days


#1 posted 665 days ago

1 – my 12” Starrett combination square.
2 – An Empire 12” rule from the combination square my son unscrewed too far and lost the spring and locking hardware.

For larger stuff, one of the dozen or so 30’ stanley powerlocks does the trick

-- www.etsy.com/shop/KandJWoodCrafts

View Loren's profile

Loren

7222 posts in 2243 days


#2 posted 665 days ago

I’m going over to metric, but for many years I’ve usually
had a little Imperial 4” double square I use a lot for laying
out joints, drill holes, depth gauging, and so forth.

The Veritas sliding square is another fave.

-- http://lawoodworking.com

View WoodWorkWarrior's profile

WoodWorkWarrior

46 posts in 668 days


#3 posted 665 days ago

Ahhh metric. I wish we (the US) would switch over. I use metric at work for everything…except dimensions of physical parts (for everything, I mean for satellite trajectories, stellar distances, photon travel…fun stuff like that).

-- Jason

View Mainiac Matt 's profile

Mainiac Matt

3829 posts in 924 days


#4 posted 665 days ago

36” Starrett with 4R graduations….

Paid a few extra bucks for a NIST certified edition…. so I can be sure to win all fo the “your rule is off” measuring arguments at work :^)

-- Pine is fine, but Oak's no joke!

View lumberjoe's profile

lumberjoe

2824 posts in 844 days


#5 posted 665 days ago

If it’s the one my father has (he’s a machinist) it costs more than my table saw and every blade I have.

Edit, and yes you will won that argument every time. It’s guaranteed accurate to one then thousandth or something ridiculous.

-- www.etsy.com/shop/KandJWoodCrafts

View jmos's profile

jmos

681 posts in 965 days


#6 posted 665 days ago

I keep 2 in my shop apron, a 6” Starrett flat steel ruler and a 4” Starrett double square. Both are great.

If I need to go bigger I’ll grab my 12” Starrett combo square or my 36” T-Square (Pinnacle I think).

Over that is my tape measure.

-- John

View BinghamtonEd's profile

BinghamtonEd

1190 posts in 965 days


#7 posted 665 days ago

6” Empire combination square.

-- - The mightiest oak in the forest is just a little nut that held its ground.

View Brett's profile

Brett

620 posts in 1278 days


#8 posted 665 days ago

I know many of the advantages for using the metric system in arenas such as science, but being able to divide a foot by halves, thirds, fourths, and sixths, and being able to divide an inch in halves, quarters, eighths, sixteens, etc. sure seems to make woodworking a little easier.

-- More tools, fewer machines.

View IsaacH's profile

IsaacH

128 posts in 692 days


#9 posted 665 days ago

When I was in construction I was an avid fan of the Stanley FatMax or a Lufkin Folding Rule.
Around the wood shop I use what ever I find, but I usually buy either Stanley of Lufkin. I dont want to burst any bubbles, but at less than 10 feet, your not really going to find more than a 1/64th out of calibration in any decent tape measure.

-- Isaac- Decatur, GA - "Your woodworking....NOT machining parts for NASA!!!"

View Tennessee's profile

Tennessee

1447 posts in 1110 days


#10 posted 665 days ago

6” Starrett flat rule, using mostly the metric side. Got a couple of them since I tend to leave them lying where i don’t look…or my wife finds them in the rear pocket of my jeans in the washer.

-- Paul, Tennessee, http://www.tsunamiguitars.com

View WoodWorkWarrior's profile

WoodWorkWarrior

46 posts in 668 days


#11 posted 665 days ago

Brett, I agree that dividing by 2’s does make things easy for woodwork. At work we use decimal inches, ex. 1.375in. Sometimes I use that feature on my Incra for intricate parts (Incra has .001” holes). When dividing odd stackups, decimals are easier than fractions – and even though they aren’t “exact” like a fraction, they are close enough for woodworking.

Lotta folks like Starrett, I need to check them out.

-- Jason

View Mainiac Matt 's profile

Mainiac Matt

3829 posts in 924 days


#12 posted 665 days ago

IIRC it cost about $100 and an extra $100 for the NIST cert. letter.

I felt we needed the NIST cert. as we use the rule to calibrate tape measures.

My biggest beaf with steel rules is that so many of them do not have the ends accurately ground so you can reference off of it.

-- Pine is fine, but Oak's no joke!

View oldnovice's profile

oldnovice

3578 posts in 1963 days


#13 posted 665 days ago

Starrett 12” combo square … have three heads, square, 45° centering, and angle!

After that, a metric/American calipers that my uncle in Germany gave me about 40 years ago.

-- "I never met a board I didn't like!"

View nwbusa's profile

nwbusa

1016 posts in 881 days


#14 posted 665 days ago

My Starrett combo square and double square get a lot of use. I also have a set of steel cabinetmaker’s rules I bought from Lee Valley, and I use the 18” & 24” versions frequently.

-- John, BC, Canada

View Charlie's profile

Charlie

1001 posts in 881 days


#15 posted 665 days ago

I started using metric measurement a LOT when I embarked on my Blum Tandembox drawers for the kitchen. I have to admit that when I’m doing ANYTHING now that doesn’t have to directly reference off of something already in inches, I go metric.I have a metric rule (that also has inches on it) and a metric tape measure (that also has inches on it) and they’ve become my favorite measuring tools. Unfortunately, the rule is 36 inches and the tape measure is for longer stuff as well. I would love to find some nice metric measuring rules in shorter lengths.

I don’t buy into the “dividing inches is easier” thing. Anything you’ve always done is easier than doing something new. MIXING metric with inches gets confusing for me. But starting a new project from scratch, I prefer to use metric.

showing 1 through 15 of 53 replies

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

GardenTenders.com :: gardening showcase