| Forum topic by Mark Shultz | posted 306 days ago | 624 views | 0 times favorited | 13 replies | ![]() |
![]() |
|
306 days ago |
inspired by all the plane restoration stories here i came across a cheap Stanley 9 3/4” plane, which i assume is a #4. unfortunately i don’t have any before photos, but I have put some effort into taking all the rust off the sides and bottom and sharpened the blade (scary). when i got done with flattening the bottom, i noticed a low spot around the mouth (see photo). Since the rest of the bed is now flat, it would take a large amount of effort to get the mouth opening flat / coplaner with the rest of the bed. Can some of you comment on if this area around the mouth will impact performance much?
|
13 replies so far
|
#1 posted 305 days ago |
Which way is the front? The area in front of the mouth MUST be in contact with the wood, i.e flat, to get perfect results. Otherwise the wood fibers will not be held down as the blade begins to lift and shear them. Still a good plane to use as is, but not for the finest smoothing, which a Stanley #4 isn’t great for fo begin with. -- I restore the finest vintage tools! If you need a nice plane, saw, marking tool or brace, please let me know! |
|
#2 posted 305 days ago |
If your low spot is in front of the mouth, you will have problems, just like RS mentioned. If thats the case and you don’t want to flatten it I guess you could always sharpen the blade with a heavy camber and use it like a scrub plane…Just a thought, but I’m no expert! -- Jason K |
|
#3 posted 305 days ago |
thanks. both front/back sides are messed up. buying a new better smoother and making that a scrub plane sounds like a good plan. |
|
#4 posted 305 days ago |
I don’t know what you are after, but there are a few beautifully restored smoothers available for a very good price here. And no, I’m not affiliated with Don, I just think his tool restorations are amazing. Good luck! -- Jason K |
|
#5 posted 305 days ago |
Still a good plane to use as is, but not for the finest smoothing, which a Stanley #4 isn’t great for fo begin with. -- My dad and I built a 65 chev pick up.I killed trannys in that thing for some reason-Hog |
|
#6 posted 305 days ago |
Technically it will (affect performance) but don’t let that stop I never flatten old iron planes and all of mine seem to work |
|
#7 posted 305 days ago |
I would also disagree. Mark I would try to keep flattening to see if that hollow goes away. I know it sucks but It’s kind of important to have that in contact with the wood. Either that or make that a scrub plane, Paul Sellers uses a #4 as a scrub plane for rough work with a cambered iron. -- Mauricio - Woodstock, GA - "Confusion is the Womb of Learning, with utter conviction being it's Tomb" Prof. T.O. Nitsch |
|
#8 posted 305 days ago |
My advice would be to get a sharp iron in it and see how it works. I have had planes with less then perfect soles perform at a premium level. The sole is important but not nearly as important as a truly sharp edge. You have to try it in order to know if its an issue or not. My bet is with a sharp iron that plane will work just fine. -- Dan - "Collector of Hand Planes" |
|
#9 posted 305 days ago |
Proofs in the shavings. I’d try it. It hard to tell by the picture but I think it would work. -- There is nothing like the sound of a well tuned hand plane. - http://timetestedtools.wordpress.com (timetestedtools at hotmail dot c0m) |
|
#10 posted 305 days ago |
Dan and Don know what they are talking about, I think the tight mouth is gravy, sharp iron and very closely set chip breaker are probably more important. -- Mauricio - Woodstock, GA - "Confusion is the Womb of Learning, with utter conviction being it's Tomb" Prof. T.O. Nitsch |
|
#11 posted 305 days ago |
It depends on the wood you’re planing as well. Hard Maple, for example, is less forgiving in this regard than Walnut. It’s hard to tell beforehand what effect the low spot will have on various wood types until you try it. |
|
#12 posted 305 days ago |
Did you flatten the sole with the iron under tension? (with the iron just retracted enough of course) or here -- Sylvain, Brussels, Belgium, Europe - The more I learn, the more there is to learn |
|
#13 posted 304 days ago |
I will clarify my above statement. I have absolutely no issue using a Stanley #4 for a general smoother. As Mauricio has kindly showed us with his photo, It can work almost perfectly on non tricky woods. But for the finest smoothing on all woods, I like a plane with an adjustable mouth, thicker iron, and higher cutting angle such as the Veritas BUS. Or, a nice heavy infill plane with a thick iron and tight mouth also makes a world of difference. So will a Stanley #4 do a great job, it sure will!! But it’s not the finest of smoothers, and I guess until you try a really well made infill, it’s hard to know what your missing! -- I restore the finest vintage tools! If you need a nice plane, saw, marking tool or brace, please let me know! |
Have your say...
|
You must be signed in to reply.
|
| Forum | Topics |
|---|---|
Woodworking Skill Share
|
8846 |
Woodturning
|
246 |
Woodcarving
|
32 |
Scrollsawing
|
69 |
Joinery
|
96 |
Finishing
|
1599 |
Designing Woodworking Projects
|
3593 |
Power Tools, Hardware and Accessories
|
15980 |
Hand Tools
|
2097 |
Jigs & Fixtures
|
501 |
Wood & Lumber
|
2908 |
Safety in the Woodworking Shop
|
813 |
Focus on the Workspace
|
925 |
Sweating for Bucks Through Woodworking
|
778 |
Woodworking Trade & Swap
|
2777 |
LumberJocks.com Site Feedback
|
1553 |
Coffee Lounge
|
6133 |























