Framing square not square

  • Advertise with us

« back to Hand Tools forum

Forum topic by Brett posted 08-10-2012 11:17 PM 2303 views 0 times favorited 8 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View Brett's profile


660 posts in 2106 days

08-10-2012 11:17 PM

A couple years ago I bought a combination square at a home center. When I tested it, I found it was out of square by almost 1/8” over about 8”. I bought another brand and it tested fine.

I’m at the point in my Roubo-bench build that I need to cut the ends square to the sides. Because of my previous experience with combination squares, I decided to test my framing square first—and it was off by about 1/16” over 24”. I checked the brand and—yep—it was the same as the bad combination square.

So, with that little anecdote out of the way, here’s my actual question: several months ago I read about a technique to correct a bad (metal) framing square, but I’ve forgotten the details. Does anybody know how to fix an out-of-square metal framing square? Thanks.

-- More tools, fewer machines.

8 replies so far

View Howie's profile


2656 posts in 2346 days

#1 posted 08-10-2012 11:31 PM

You use center punch in the corner where the tongue meets the blade. I THINK it’s punch it on the inside corner to pull it together and the outside corner to spread it out.
Someone correct me if I’m backwards.

-- Life is good.

View jmos's profile


716 posts in 1792 days

#2 posted 08-10-2012 11:36 PM

Here’s a link to an article about this

-- John

View dhazelton's profile


2289 posts in 1719 days

#3 posted 08-10-2012 11:44 PM

3-4-5 triangle – no square required.

View 8iowa's profile


1540 posts in 3184 days

#4 posted 08-11-2012 12:22 AM

The only useful combination squares that I have obtained from the “big box” are the Empire brand. However, even that said, select their Pro model. The 6 inch Empire combination square often finds a place in my apron and I use it to mark cut lines on my stock. It’s not a Starret by any means, but then it’s not such a disaster if it falls on the floor.

For machine set-ups and alignment you will appreciate Starret’s accuracy. I have a couple of framing squares but don’t use them much because they are not as square as I would like.

-- "Heaven is North of the Bridge"

View Loren's profile


8168 posts in 3071 days

#5 posted 08-11-2012 01:04 AM

View whitewulf's profile


450 posts in 2360 days

#6 posted 11-15-2012 02:46 AM


The 3 4 5 triangle is the better method. The center punch method is mostly incorrect, as is is unable to stretch the metal enough. the proper way is with hammer & anvil.

-- "ButI'mMuchBetterNow"

View MonteCristo's profile


2098 posts in 1611 days

#7 posted 11-15-2012 08:53 PM

A square framing square can be got so cheap these days I doubt it’s worth the effort.

-- Dwight - "Free legal advice available - contact Dewey, Cheetam & Howe""

View 12strings's profile


434 posts in 1807 days

#8 posted 11-16-2012 06:49 PM

I have successfully done this with my aluminum framing square. I used my countersink (for nails), put it on a concrete floor and used a metal claw hammer. Taps on the outside corner will bring it together, inside corner will spread it out. (Which, unless I am mistaken means the previous post is backwards and therefore incorrect…sorry to bear bad news…If you just think about what’s happening to the metal, it will make sense) It left small little circles on one side of the square, but they don’t bother me. I suppose I could have cracked the concrete, so watch out for that. I didn’t take very long. You may find out that you can’t get the inside and outside edge square at the same time, so you’ll have to pick one. I chose inside edge…It works very well now, and I know I can do it again if needed.

I should also mention that I did not keep pounding the same spot, I made a sort of diagonal line of punches leading to the corner.

Method described here:

-- I'm strictly hand-tool only...unless the power tool is faster and easier!

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics