« back to Focus on the Workspace forum
| Forum topic by Gareth00 | posted 505 days ago | 3705 views | 0 times favorited | 42 replies | ![]() |
![]() |
|
505 days ago |
Topic tags/keywords: workbench height design beginner question As a beginner I recognise that I need to build the best workbench I can afford, taking into account my low skill level. Planning is essential and that’s what I’m doing now, by reading all the stuff on the site and with a couple of books I have. One thing is puzzling me, the height of the bench seems to be a critical factor and I would like to build my bench the same height as my table saw (34”) for outfeed. But I’m a bit of a shortarse, I have to stand on a box to scratch my head. Is there a formula or guide to bench height:user height:comfort? I’d be grateful for any advice or observations. |
42 replies so far
|
#1 posted 505 days ago |
Critical piece of information needed: Your work include significant use of handplanes? -- Don't anthropomorphize your handplanes. They hate it when you do that. -- OldTools Archive |
|
#2 posted 505 days ago |
Common rule of thumb, belt height for most hand work but its more convenient to have it be able to double as an outfeed or extension table – hence same height as tablesaw 34-35” |
|
#3 posted 505 days ago |
I have a work table (not what I would call a bench but a large table) that is my outfeed table as well as my assembly table. It is the height of my table saw and I do well with it. I am 6 feet tall and my belt is 44 inches from the floor. A standard kitchen cabinet is 36 inches tall in the USA. If the 34 inch table is too tall for you then I might consider a large sturdy box that I could slide up to the side and stand on. An 8 inch lift would be a significant difference but surely you wouldn’t want to work on something 24 inches tall. Even a 2 or 3 inch lift would change things. You really want a table that doesn’t hurt your back from stooping. I think it is all preference. |
|
#4 posted 505 days ago |
The general rule is half of your height + 2” (i’ve learned that at school, so i assume it’s right). |
|
#5 posted 505 days ago |
@Smitty_Cabinetshop – No sir, I’m a total newbie. I had a No.5 plane as a gift at Christmas….still in the box, can’t even set it up. @Weetabix – That’s the kind of thing I’m looking for, I’m off to measure my belt height from the floor. |
|
#6 posted 505 days ago |
I’d suggest you design your bench so that you can cut the legs down later if needed – in other words, avoid trestle feet. If you end up using mostly power tools a higher bench is great, and you get an outfeed table. If you get into hand planing, you’ll want it lower. If you get into wooden hand planes you’ll want it lower still. I’m building a bench now; I’m 6’ and I’m aiming for about 32 1/2” height. I’m using a lot more metal hand planes than I thought I would; I’ve caught the bug. -- John |
|
#7 posted 505 days ago |
I am a short person. My bench is 1” lower than my table saw. When I need to use it as an outfeed table I have a reclaimed table top that I put on top to make the height equal. I like a cutting bench to be lower when I use power skill saws ,etc. (28” works for me) Then when I am hand planing I like it higher. I have a portable bench that I mount on TOP of bench to get the height I want. -- "My mission in life - make everyone smile !" |
|
#8 posted 505 days ago |
Gareth, Welcome to Woodworking! Then I’d have to say John ^ has it right: Make the workbench the height your thinking, to fill the role of outfeed table, but keep the leg design such that it can be lowered. I say that because you may find your bench being no where near your tablesaw when and if you ever get into hand tool woodworking… For me, the tablesaw gets stuff (raw material) into dimension. Other tools make projects. But your results can (and likely will) vary. So stay flexible, make it the way you want it, rules of thumb are good for that!, and have fun! -- Don't anthropomorphize your handplanes. They hate it when you do that. -- OldTools Archive |
|
#9 posted 505 days ago |
Ok, just figured I’d piggyback on this thread with my own related question. I’m 5’10” and I got mixed results using different approaches listed here. If I were to make a bench at the height of my belt, I get 40 inches. But If I take the approach of dividing my height in half then adding two inches, I get 37 inches. And yes, I plan on doing a fair amount of hand work. Using a bench as an outfeed table would be nice, but I can always make a flip-up extension attached to my table saw instead if need be. What say you folks? -- Brian in Arlington, TX - Laziness is the foundation of efficiency. |
|
#10 posted 505 days ago |
I’m just shy of 5’10” and my bench is 34” high. Only do hand tool work on it. Why that height? It’s within an inch of my table saw, radial arm saw and assy bench. And less seemed too short. With legs, it could be cut shorter if needed, but it’s fine for me. For what it’s worth. -- Don't anthropomorphize your handplanes. They hate it when you do that. -- OldTools Archive |
|
#11 posted 505 days ago |
The general rule of thumb I always used is standing relaxed the work bench for hand tools should be to the hieght of the knuckle of your pinky finger and your hand. Power tools at about the waist. I’m 6’ 4” tall and my hand tool bench is 34”. That puts my knuckles pretty close to the floor. So it really depends on your comfort and what type of work you want to do. -- Richard, North Carolina, http://graywolfwoodworks.wordpress.com/ |
|
#12 posted 505 days ago |
This is all terrific feedback and just the kind of input I was looking for. I now recognise the need to incorporate bench legs that can be shortened later. I’d have never come up with that for myself. Thanks everyone for commenting and for the warm welcome. |
|
#13 posted 505 days ago |
How good is your eyesight? :^) -- Pine is fine, but Oak's no joke! |
|
#14 posted 505 days ago |
Gareth: Now get that bench built and get out that #5… You’ve got work to do! :-) -- Don't anthropomorphize your handplanes. They hate it when you do that. -- OldTools Archive |
|
#15 posted 504 days ago |
I’m a shade over 6’ and I prefer ~34” for hand tool work and ~37” for general work bench / power tool work. I’ve never cut dovetails by hand, but I believe the general theory is that for chissel work, you want to take advantage of your body weight. by positioning yourself more over the work, with your arms straight, you can transfer gravity forces down onto you workpiece more readilly. The same goes for hand planes. This kind of hand work benefits from a lower work bench. And guys who do it all day long will tell you that they fatigue less quickly. -- Pine is fine, but Oak's no joke! |
Have your say...
|
You must be signed in to reply.
|
| Forum | Topics |
|---|---|
Woodworking Skill Share
|
8846 |
Woodturning
|
246 |
Woodcarving
|
32 |
Scrollsawing
|
69 |
Joinery
|
96 |
Finishing
|
1599 |
Designing Woodworking Projects
|
3593 |
Power Tools, Hardware and Accessories
|
15980 |
Hand Tools
|
2097 |
Jigs & Fixtures
|
501 |
Wood & Lumber
|
2907 |
Safety in the Woodworking Shop
|
813 |
Focus on the Workspace
|
925 |
Sweating for Bucks Through Woodworking
|
778 |
Woodworking Trade & Swap
|
2777 |
LumberJocks.com Site Feedback
|
1553 |
Coffee Lounge
|
6133 |




















