LumberJocks

Jointer type question...

« back to Woodworking Tools, Hardware and Accessories forum

Forum topic by StraightEdge posted 172 days ago 170 views 0 times favorited 6 replies Add to Favorites
View StraightEdge's profile

StraightEdge

26 posts in 179 days


172 days ago

Topic tags/keywords: question jointer

Hi all!

Looking at all my future purchases has given rise to a question concerning jointers.

There are “parallelogram” types and what I would considered regular, or “non-parallelogram” types.

In reading the descriptions of the jointers, I still do not get a sense of what the difference is.

Looking for some insight.

ps. I am so thrilled to have found this wonderful site! Thanks Marc at The Wood Whisperer for the reference!

Carlyle

-- Cheers!

View GaryK's profile

GaryK

8489 posts in 475 days


172 days ago

I figure it’s more of a marketing ploy than something really useful.

I think that the only advantage to a parallelogram type is that the infeed table will stay a little closer to the
cutter head as it moves up and down.

I never take move that 1/16” at a time so it really doesn’t matter to me.

-- Gary, East TX -- The longest journey begins with a single step.

View StraightEdge's profile

StraightEdge

26 posts in 179 days


172 days ago

Thanks Gary

Just found a post from Todd A Clippinger from about a year ago…

“The benefit of the parallelogram table is that the opening remains smaller or tighter to the cutter head as the depth is changed. I talked to a guy that had one in a 12” model, but that was because that is just the way it was offered, not because that is what he was trying to buy. He admitted it was nicer but was fairly indifferent about it. You might research it more.”

Guess that makes sense…

Thanks

-- Cheers!

View Al Killian's profile

Al Killian

179 posts in 240 days


172 days ago

They are supposed to be easeir to setup and hold there alginment better. Not really sure tho, as I am still using a pile of scrap ready for the recyclers.

View motthunter's profile

motthunter

1224 posts in 286 days


172 days ago

If you are looking to spend a bit more for quality, I have seen the difference between regular cutters and spiral heads… My opinion is that the spiral head is the best investment. Next time I need new blades for my jointer, I plan to retrofit to a spiral head.

-- making sawdust....

View Chris 's profile

Chris

1234 posts in 478 days


172 days ago

I was speaking with a former rep from Powermatic; he stated that in some cases as the non-parallelogram jointer gets older and has a few miles on it that there is a chance that the infeed or outfeed tables will “sag” due to wear and tear on the dovetailed ?guideway? (the track the table slides in) which will require that you shim the offending guideway in order to make the tables co-planar once again.

Apparently this does not occur with the parallelogram jointer. But, I do not even own a jointer; what do I know….

:)

-- Chris

View John Ormsby's profile

John Ormsby

163 posts in 224 days


172 days ago

I use a parallelogram jointer and have had a few different standard types. They both will do the work very well if properly tuned. Shimming an older standard type is not a big issue. Just part of keeping any tool aligned. John

-- Oldworld, Fair Oaks, Ca

You must be signed in to reply.

Your Online Shop - Your Support Is Greatly Appreciated - Your Woodworking Showcase - 3 Ways To Help, Financially - Your Woodworking Community

Woodworking StoreApparel StoreMake a Donation
Bookmark And Share This Page
  • View all advertisers
  • Advertise with us

DISCLAIMER: All views and comments posted by members are not necessarily those of LumberJocks.com or of those working on the site.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

GardenTenders.com :: gardening showcase