| Forum topic by Bertha | posted 631 days ago | 1327 views | 0 times favorited | 53 replies | ![]() |
![]() |
|
631 days ago |
Topic tags/keywords: bullcoming melendez diaz justin bieber I don’t expect this thread to get much attention but I’ve noticed some pretty high caliber political arguments around here with some well read combatants on both sides. Here’s a recent Supreme Court decision that’s becoming growingly problematic in the courts. I’m curious if anyone’s familiar with this decision and whether you have any predictions. The second link provides html and pdf links to the dissenting opinion (not that I’m biased or anything but I’ll provide it here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/9-10876P.ZD) ;) http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-10876.pdf http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/9-10876.ZS.html -- My dad and I built a 65 chev pick up.I killed trannys in that thing for some reason-Hog |
53 replies so far
|
#1 posted 631 days ago |
I’m a hardcore followerer of Constitution Law/Judicial Law, but tl;dr at the moment. I am, however, thrilled that there are some justices who still have their heads on straight— http://www.newburyportnews.com/opinion/x2134993461/Court-upholds-publics-right-to-monitor-police -- Dan, Rochester, NY |
|
#2 posted 631 days ago |
Life is tl;dr at the moment for me. This particular decision is making my life difficult. I pay attorneys a lot of money and none of them can tell me what’s ACTUALLY going to happen. But whatever it is, it’s starting to happen. I’m glad you’re a ConLaw fanboy. We need more of those. If you ever get some downtime, at least skim it and read the dissent. -- My dad and I built a 65 chev pick up.I killed trannys in that thing for some reason-Hog |
|
#3 posted 631 days ago |
Roger that. In brief? I skimmed and it looked like evidence had to be presented manually? -- Dan, Rochester, NY |
|
#4 posted 631 days ago |
That’s a pretty good Cliff. It means that the defense can call all manner of ancillary staff to appear from the outside lab to the mailroom. I’m still unsure who’s going to accept the financial burden of producing these witnesses. -- My dad and I built a 65 chev pick up.I killed trannys in that thing for some reason-Hog |
|
#5 posted 631 days ago |
Really Al, Justin Bieber????? -- StevieP ~ Micheal Tompkins - you were not here on earth long but left a giant mark on us. RIP Brother |
|
#6 posted 631 days ago |
Oh yeah.. I totally forgot to mention that. Dude. What gives. Baby Baby Baby been on repeat on your ipod all day? edit I don’t like that when I search for “somebody to love” on youtube, he beats out Queen. -- Dan, Rochester, NY |
|
#7 posted 631 days ago |
Political arguments? Around here? Please… let’s not spoil things! ;) I have no thoughts on Bullcoming, but as for Constitution Law, I personally think that Citizens United v. FEC was the beginning of the end for this country as we know it (and as the founding fathers intended it.) Combined with the general gullibility of the citizenry, it gave the Koch Brothers and ALEC free reign to legislatively subvert the most fundamental underpinnings of the Constitution. I have become a future expatriate. I just need to find a country with good weather, good civil rights policy, a single-payer healthcare system, and good, sustainable forestry. (Panama is looking pretty good.) -- Founding member of the (un)Official LumberJock's Frugal Woodworking Society - http://lumberjocks.com/topics/29451 |
|
#8 posted 631 days ago |
Al, I did just read the entire thing. First, thank you for taking nearly 30 minutes from my precious life (yeah, I took the Helen Keller speed reading course long ago). =) <= lol @ new symbol Second, That’s crazy. So will there be a new job category of watching the GS while it runs overnight to make certain that the chain of evidence is not broken ? Will that have to be the same person that filled out the paperwork AND goes to court ? Third, (a question)... Do they pay mileage for the lab jobs in New Mexico ? Fourth (last) – So what other case NEEDS this exclusion of evidence and WHO is it important to ? To err on the side of caution is a good thing, but not if squarely in the realm of stupidity. -- If you're going to stir the pot, think BIG spoon or SMALL boat paddle. David Grimes, Georgia |
|
#9 posted 631 days ago |
Hey, Donny. Don’t forget Belize. -- If you're going to stir the pot, think BIG spoon or SMALL boat paddle. David Grimes, Georgia |
|
#10 posted 631 days ago |
^whew. Thank you, Grimes. I was worried that I was the only one. =) I like the new symbol, too, and will be stealing it=). First, sorry about that; it is painful. Second, EVERYONE’S fair game. You can no longer just subpoena the guy (doctor, for example) that “interpreted” the data; you now subpoena everyone involved with the generation of that data (from beginning to end). Third, who pays is still up in the air. Let’s not talk too loudly about who pays. For now, at least, the defense has been absorbing most of it. Fourth, I like the notion of being able to face your accuser. However, the lab nerd with the MS in molecular biochemistry, the guy twisting knobs on the chromatograph, he’s not your accuser. It allows the defense to impeach ancillary staff in an effor to muddy the waters. These waters are revealing an iceberg’s tip, I fear. -- My dad and I built a 65 chev pick up.I killed trannys in that thing for some reason-Hog |
|
#11 posted 631 days ago |
Donny, I feel the urge. I understand your compulsion to bail. It’s very frustrating because I love America. I know of quite a few retirees that are headed to Costa Rica where their paltry retirement stretches a little further. We probably should say Belize and Panama too loudly; keep it a secret=) -- My dad and I built a 65 chev pick up.I killed trannys in that thing for some reason-Hog |
|
#12 posted 631 days ago |
Hey Al, He Lied. He just faked the data? Faked the data. They had inconclusives, or just gave the results they wanted, didn’t even do the tests. He moved on to San Antonio, Texas, where he did the same thing. Joyce Gilchrist, whom we mention in our book in the first edition (we have a new one coming out in the fall), has now been caught in Oklahoma City, a known ersatz forensic scientist, who was caught giving results that didn’t make any sense, where she may not have even done the work, and she’s been fired. Now they’re looking at 3,000 cases and [will] whittle them down to another about 300. We have lab scandals today in Houston, Texas—Harris County. If Harris County, Texas, were a state, they would have executed more people in this country than any state other than Texas.” P.S. It really, really screwed things up here in Texas and we all wished you had kept this good-ole-boy in WV. Too bad he died before any real justice was served him. That being said, I truly believe the Fred Zane case applies to such a ruling in your posted case on DWI. -- HorizontalMike -- "Woodpeckers understand..." |
|
#13 posted 631 days ago |
Awesome!!! Leave it to Horizontal to be on it like a hawk. Zane’s not a medical examiner, though, Mike. He was a scumbag toxicologist, if even that. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Zain I can’t believe I just referenced wikipedia. Oh well, we’re all woodworkers here. The jurisprudence section of the AAFS talked a lot about ole Zane last year, lol. I was embarrassed to say where I lived for the first time. You’re right, Mike, Zane kind of nucleated this whole mess (you like that astro lingo? ;) It’s since supernova’d, as I’m sure you’re aware. Old Barry and the Innocence crew, always tinkering with the nucleotides, lol. -- My dad and I built a 65 chev pick up.I killed trannys in that thing for some reason-Hog |
|
#14 posted 631 days ago |
Dunno what you guys really are talking about, but I have several bottles of a delicately brewed french beer from the Alps handy if any of you want a nice drink to go along with your chat :) -- Thomas - There is no such thing as a problem, there only are solutions. |
|
#15 posted 631 days ago |
I was living in San Antonio in the late 1980s-90s when all this was blowing up and it was bigger than any Hurricane ever dreamed of being. Scumbag forensic toxicologist it is ;-) -- HorizontalMike -- "Woodpeckers understand..." |
Have your say...
|
You must be signed in to reply.
|
| Forum | Topics |
|---|---|
Woodworking Skill Share
|
8794 |
Woodturning
|
223 |
Woodcarving
|
28 |
Scrollsawing
|
61 |
Joinery
|
81 |
Finishing
|
1534 |
Designing Woodworking Projects
|
3552 |
Power Tools, Hardware and Accessories
|
15793 |
Hand Tools
|
2038 |
Jigs & Fixtures
|
495 |
Wood & Lumber
|
2841 |
Safety in the Woodworking Shop
|
809 |
Focus on the Workspace
|
902 |
Sweating for Bucks Through Woodworking
|
766 |
Woodworking Trade & Swap
|
2740 |
LumberJocks.com Site Feedback
|
1547 |
Coffee Lounge
|
6162 |




















