LumberJocks

Wood river or stanley sweetheart

  • Advertise with us

« back to Power Tools, Hardware and Accessories forum

Forum topic by kent_michaels posted 1278 days ago 3076 views 0 times favorited 6 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View kent_michaels's profile

kent_michaels

34 posts in 1328 days


1278 days ago

Topic tags/keywords: question plane

I have a few old rehabed stanley planes but I want to get a new 4 plane. LN and LV are too expensive so between the wood river and new stanley sweetheart #4 which is the better choice. They are roughly the same price. Both seem to be well made. I like the adjustable throat on the stanley but I’m not sure how I’d like the norris style adjuster. Thanks for any help.


6 replies so far

View drewnahant's profile

drewnahant

218 posts in 1725 days


#1 posted 1278 days ago

They are both nice planes, if you havent already, look at them in person. I recently went to woodcraft with a friend who was buying a couple planes, and found out a lot. I love old sweetheart planes, I have a 4, 5, and 6, but the new ones did not impress me. they worked fine, but the quality of the casting, and the milling seemed to be lacking, not in any important areas, but it speaks to the quality overall IMO. The WoodRivers are made very well, look nice, and that is what my friend ended up with, and is very happy with. The woodrivers are almost an exact dupliacate of LN, I actually tore apart a WR and a LN in the store, and found the parts interchangable.
One caveat to the WR, ask the sales person to check which production run you are buying. The first run is the best, it was the introduction, and they made them perfect, the second run they let slip, the third run they got back up to standards, and since then there isnt much deviation, but check it over carefully before taking it home.

View kent_michaels's profile

kent_michaels

34 posts in 1328 days


#2 posted 1278 days ago

Thanks for your response, I’ve handled a wood river #5 and planed some soft wood with it and was impressed. I’ve held the stanley and noticed the black paint on it seemed to be rubbing off but didn’t really look closely at it.

View wasmithee's profile

wasmithee

55 posts in 1329 days


#3 posted 1277 days ago

I purchased and returned two of the new sweetheart low angle block planes. Both had cooked beds and were not usable. I compared them and they weren’t even the same length and the finish was different on both. Low quality standards to say the least. Pretty stupid of them to associate their “sweetheart” logo with junk. I guess if they ever produce a quality plane they’ll have to give it a new logo.

I can’t speak to the WR planes. I ended up going with LV (Veritas) planes which are cheaper than the Lie Nielsen planes, but of similar quality. I am happy with my LV planes (I have three so far)

View Bertha's profile

Bertha

12951 posts in 1330 days


#4 posted 1277 days ago

I won’t trash Stanley over their new offerings; nuff said. You’re clearly versed in Stanley resto’s; why not go with a Bedrock 604 & drop a new blade/chipbreaker into it. Seems like middle $ versus imitated performance, as I see it. Either way, you’re buying handplanes, which makes you a friend of mine.

-- My dad and I built a 65 chev pick up.I killed trannys in that thing for some reason-Hog

View TechRedneck's profile

TechRedneck

738 posts in 1493 days


#5 posted 1277 days ago

As a newbie to the hand tools (I’m getting hooked) I broke down and purchased the WR #4 over Christmas and absolutely love it. I had an old Fulton #3 from my grandfather that I worked on for a while and had it tuned and sharp. The WR has a lot more “beef” to it especially the iron. I also bought a Bahco scraper and learned how to sharpen it with a file in the bench vice and don’t use a burnisher. Both of these tools have changed the way I work now.

I am putting the finishing touches on a custom window seat for the wife to store fabric for her quilting. The solid oak face frame was about 1/16” proud of the top. The plane and scraper made short work of cleaning up the joint.

The WR is easy for me to adjust, and took just a little time to wipe off all the oil, scary sharp the Iron and I was making shavings in no time on red oak.

-- Mike.... West Virginia. "Man is a tool using animal. Without tools he is nothing, with tools he is all.". T Carlyle

View HorizontalMike's profile

HorizontalMike

6928 posts in 1550 days


#6 posted 1277 days ago

What the Redneck says. I feel the same about my WR #4. FWIW, my only other experience is my GG-pa’s #418 Sargent and 1860s 22” Auburn jointer. The solid feel and adjustment has me convinced that this is worth buying, regardless. I also bought WR’s LA-block plane and a UK-Stanley #92 recently.

My vote, buy the WR #4. Buying any more than this is just bells and whistles…

-- HorizontalMike -- "Woodpeckers understand..."

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

GardenTenders.com :: gardening showcase