A cell phone in 1928???

  • Advertise with us

« back to Coffee Lounge forum

Forum topic by 8iowa posted 1389 days ago 912 views 0 times favorited 15 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View 8iowa's profile


1489 posts in 2385 days

1389 days ago

15 replies so far

View TJ65's profile


1354 posts in 1674 days

#1 posted 1389 days ago

Amazing- I’m with the time travel theory!!!!!

-- Theresa,

View Karson's profile


34869 posts in 3024 days

#2 posted 1389 days ago

my son looked at that quite deeply a couple of days ago and the hair and the shoes seem to suggest that it’s Charlie and not some woman. I don’t believe that we had a time travler visit his movie set.

Even if it was a cell phone there would not have been any cell towers in his time so a cell phone would not work.

-- I've been blessed with a father who liked to tinker in wood, and a wife who lets me tinker in wood. Southern Delaware †

View JJohnston's profile


1577 posts in 1915 days

#3 posted 1389 days ago

Listen to the morons on Fox News: “It can’t be a transistor radio; those wouldn’t have been invented for another 20 years. It can’t be a walkie-talkie; those wouldn’t have been invented for another 10.” The implication, of course, is that it therefore must be a cell phone (never mind the fact that those wouldn’t have been invented for another 70).

-- "Sorry I'm late. Somebody tampered with my brakes." "You should have been early, then."

View sandhill's profile


2117 posts in 2548 days

#4 posted 1389 days ago

Maybe it was an alien asking to get beamed back up.

-- Bob Egbert AKA Sandhill

View JJohnston's profile


1577 posts in 1915 days

#5 posted 1389 days ago

Maybe she sassed her husband and he boxed her ears.

OMG did I say that out loud??

-- "Sorry I'm late. Somebody tampered with my brakes." "You should have been early, then."

View Knothead62's profile


2364 posts in 1585 days

#6 posted 1389 days ago

Maybe she had a fly in her ear!

#7 posted 1389 days ago

Having analyzed many grainy, out of focus and otherwise hard to understand photos, I think I know what the image is showing.
The person in question is not a paid “extra”, but a casual passerby.
Having seen the camera, she doesn’t wish to be recognized.
The “phone” she’s holding is the collar of her coat.
Her hat is tilted toward the camera and the collar finished the job of concealing her face.
Nothing mysterious about the image, to my mind.

By the way, I AM a time traveler!
I came here from the starting point of 1933, pretty close to the TIME when the ‘mystery’ photo was taken.
It’s a hard road to travel and I find that I can’t get back, not that it was such a great place (time?) anyway.

After all, the Great Depression was in full swing then.


-- Will trade wife's yarn for tools.

View knotscott's profile


5414 posts in 1999 days

#8 posted 1389 days ago

I think it’s a spoof. A vacuum tube cell phone would be large, hot, and would need an incredible battery pack!

-- Happiness is like wetting your pants...everyone can see it, but only you can feel the warmth....

View dusty2's profile


312 posts in 2053 days

#9 posted 1388 days ago

Does it have to have vacuum tubes just because it was years ago? I mean, after all, we are talking about time travelers.

-- Making Sawdust Safely

View Daren Nelson's profile

Daren Nelson

767 posts in 2529 days

#10 posted 1388 days ago

It’s an ear trumpet, or old timey hearing aid…


View Shopsmithtom's profile


780 posts in 2819 days

#11 posted 1388 days ago

Just wondering who she was talking to.

-- Accuracy is not in your power tool, it's in you

View NathanAllen's profile


376 posts in 1768 days

#12 posted 1387 days ago

Regardless of what it is there is an important lession here.

The best example I can think of is the leg twitch. Before we had cell phones that would vibrate in our pants pocket we had no frame of reference; it was just a twitch. But now no matter if you’re positive your phone is in another location you invariably check your pocket after one. We’ve managed to associate a body function with a piece of technology because we’re easily fooled by mimicry.

This woman’s actions mimic talking into a cell phone; something that is a representative action. Take ten people dancing; none of them look alike but our brain has a representative picture of dancing so we can identify them all as dancing. Maybe one is actually having a seizure; nevermind our brain still says “dancing.” We rely on patterns to speed up recognition. The main reason why we see faces in the floor, walls and patterns where they don’t actually exist (Grilled Jesus Sandwich) is bad “software” leftover from when we had to recognize patterns quickly or risk being eaten by a big cat.

Twenty years ago we wouldn’t have associated this woman’s actions with talking on a cell phone and twenty years from now people will see something different. However, right now our brains are fooled by mimicry into recognizing a pattern that doesn’t actually exist.

View ChuckC's profile


683 posts in 1559 days

#13 posted 1387 days ago

Maybe she was calling her agent since she wanted to be in the movie too :-)

View Peter Oxley's profile

Peter Oxley

1426 posts in 2498 days

#14 posted 1387 days ago

Wait, she’s from far enough in the future that time travel is available, but she’s still using 2010 technology for communication?

-- -- --

View ChuckC's profile


683 posts in 1559 days

#15 posted 1387 days ago

If you look closely at the label she is holding an iPhone 89G :-)

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics :: gardening showcase