LumberJocks

porter cable 100m bearings

  • Advertise with us

« back to Power Tools, Hardware and Accessories forum

Forum topic by olrac posted 03-12-2017 06:32 PM 600 views 0 times favorited 7 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View olrac's profile

olrac

9 posts in 1358 days


03-12-2017 06:32 PM

Topic tags/keywords: 100m bearings

Does anyone know the number for replacement bearings for these routers? I tried e-replacement parts for the 1001 router which I thought was the same as the 100 but the top bearing they supplied is not wide enough. The ID and OD are correct but the 100m bearing is wider.
Carlo


7 replies so far

View Bill White's profile (online now)

Bill White

5072 posts in 4109 days


#1 posted 03-12-2017 07:18 PM

Carlo,
The bearings will have a number etched on themselves.

That’s the number that you should use.

Bill

-- bill@magraphics.us

View olrac's profile

olrac

9 posts in 1358 days


#2 posted 03-12-2017 10:12 PM

Bill, The number on the top bearing didn’t show up anywhere or cross reference to another. I did find a match by measuring though. It’s on the way. I’ll post the numbers once I have success Thanks for your quick response :)

Carlo.

View Woodknack's profile

Woodknack

12369 posts in 2528 days


#3 posted 03-13-2017 01:47 AM

What were the numbers? I just replaced bearings in a PC router, different model, and took the numbers right off the bearing.

-- Rick M, http://thewoodknack.blogspot.com/

View olrac's profile

olrac

9 posts in 1358 days


#4 posted 03-14-2017 06:24 PM

Rick, The number on the original top bearing was MRC 30zz-b or MRC 30zz-3. The numbers were tiny and printed on the rubber seal. Most places suggested a 608zz. It’s dimensions are 8×22x7. The original ws 8×22x10.4 I found a bearing from 123 bearings # 608-2RS-W103 8×22x10.3.

View MrUnix's profile

MrUnix

6948 posts in 2347 days


#5 posted 03-14-2017 06:59 PM

Are you sure it’s 30, and not 38? According to the MRC engineering handbook, they don’t have a ‘30’, but the 38 does have the same bore (8mm) and OD (22mm) that you describe. Grab a lupe or find a way to magnify the thing so you can be sure of the number. The 38ZZ-3 does exist in the wild :)

Anyway, it sounds like the one you found should work… 0.1mm difference could be just a measuring error.

Cheers,
Brad

-- Brad in FL - In Dog I trust... everything else is questionable

View Woodknack's profile

Woodknack

12369 posts in 2528 days


#6 posted 03-14-2017 07:07 PM

My PC router used an NTN 608Z. This is the bottom bearing, farthest from the cutter.
I bought this one:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/371829017383?_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Your other bearing may be an MRC WC88038, but I won’t swear to it.
8mm bore, 22mm od, 10.4 mm (.4”) width
(this is one of those weirdo mixed unit, metric/inch, bearings)

-- Rick M, http://thewoodknack.blogspot.com/

View DDWW's profile

DDWW

90 posts in 775 days


#7 posted 03-19-2018 02:50 PM

I know this is old but if someone is looking here’s what I pulled out of and just replaced on my Rockwell version 100m. I found both replacements at VXB.Bearings through amazon w free shipping.

My 100m had a 77201 – 13 mm bore Hoover. I could not find one but I did find a 6201-13 2rs that is the same dimensions.

The other was a 9088 DD which was 8mm 22mm by 10mm and I used a 30/8ZZ Angular Contact Double Row Bearing 8×22x11mm
Easiest is to go with a Japanese made 608 series bearing, they are only 7mm instead of 10.mm Avoid the Chinese versions used for skate wheels, I don’t think they will hold up.

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com