LumberJocks

Shoulder plane iron width

  • Advertise with us

« back to Hand Tools forum

Forum topic by Carloz posted 03-07-2017 08:07 AM 348 views 0 times favorited 6 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View Carloz's profile

Carloz

963 posts in 426 days


03-07-2017 08:07 AM

I just received a Stanley Sweetheart 92 shoulder plane. The sides seems to be acceptable square to the sole. However the manufactring is not what i would expect from a flagship series. The dimples on the sides obviously are made with a dull instrument, and the body edges are razor sharp, enought to cut through the skin. However the most worrysome issue is that the blade is about 0.2 mm narrower than the plane body. It also wanders to the side when adjusting it. I thought that the iron should be a bit wider than the body, otherwise it defeats the purpose. Can you share your thoughts before I return it ?


6 replies so far

View BrettLuna's profile

BrettLuna

43 posts in 397 days


#1 posted 03-07-2017 08:57 AM

I don’t know if this will be helpful…

I’m pretty happy with my Sweetheart LA block plane and I looked pretty hard at shoulder planes from Stanley and others before eventually buying Veritas in both medium and large. I don’t regret it for a minute. Otherwise, perhaps a replacement blade from another manufacturer might fix one problem.

-- Brett — Peters Creek, Alaska

View rwe2156's profile

rwe2156

2710 posts in 1315 days


#2 posted 03-07-2017 02:23 PM

Sadly, Stanley of today is not what Stanley was of yesterday.

-- Everything is a prototype thats why its one of a kind!!

View waho6o9's profile

waho6o9

8027 posts in 2412 days


#3 posted 03-07-2017 02:37 PM

http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/stanley-sweet-heart-no-92-shoulder-plane

Less than stellar review for said plane.

Veritas shoulder planes would better for you.

View TheFridge's profile

TheFridge

8288 posts in 1321 days


#4 posted 03-07-2017 03:29 PM

It pretty much needs to be the same width. .008 is enough to feel it isn’t flush. I’d send it back.

-- Shooting down the walls of heartache. Bang bang. I am. The warrior.

View rjpat's profile

rjpat

41 posts in 1813 days


#5 posted 03-07-2017 04:29 PM

I have one of these planes and it suffers from none of the problems you noticed. It is a very nice plane. I would send it back it is was mine.

View Tim's profile

Tim

3680 posts in 1796 days


#6 posted 03-07-2017 09:05 PM

I’m trying to think about using one like that and the blade being that slightly too narrow doesn’t really seem to be a problem since you set the blade flush to the side you plane to use it on. Try the technique in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8eP7dp6-fA and try holding the blade flush to the side you want when you tighten it. If you can’t get it to hold at the setting you want it at, definitely take it back.

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com