Your Advice - which would look better, stain or natural?

  • Advertise with us

« back to Woodworking Skill Share forum

Forum topic by Underdog posted 12-07-2015 08:04 PM 581 views 0 times favorited 8 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View Underdog's profile


878 posts in 1456 days

12-07-2015 08:04 PM

I’m building this lift desk where the top raises so that I can stand at my computer and work. Sitting down so much is having negative effects on my health.
You can read about the whole shebang on my blog.

Now I’m nearing the final stages, and I have to make a irreversible decision about whether to paint the modesty panels that raise with the top, and the sub tops black, leave them natural, or stain all the maple.
Also not shown is the small beauty mold that is already painted black, that will frame “panels” on the back and the end panels.
I should mention that the doors/drawers will be shaker flat panel/slabs.

So my question to you is what would you do with this?

1) Would you frame panels with the beauty mold to add more detail, or leave the panels plain?

2) a)Would you use a pre stain conditioner (Charles Neils) and stain it Cherry,
or b) would you leave it natural,
or c) natural with black paint on the modesty panels and sub tops?

-- "woodworker with an asterisk"

8 replies so far

View haskins's profile


111 posts in 659 days

#1 posted 12-07-2015 09:48 PM

I think it looks great natural, maybe just add some clear danish oil.

-- father son woodworks

View AandCstyle's profile


2538 posts in 1678 days

#2 posted 12-08-2015 12:43 AM

Underdog, I agree with baskins that it should have a natural finish. Maple is such a beautiful wood that it would be a shame to hide it under paint and a cherry stain will never look like real cherry, so why go through all the aggravation?

-- Art

View runswithscissors's profile


2127 posts in 1446 days

#3 posted 12-08-2015 01:41 AM

I generally prefer to leave wood as close to natural as possible, but even clear finishes do darken to various degrees. Some people can’t bear to not stain wood, no matter how beautiful the stuff is.

I’m picturing somebody building out of black walnut, and then trying to “stain” it so it looks like pine.

-- I admit to being an adrenaline junky; fortunately, I'm very easily frightened

View Picken5's profile


220 posts in 2112 days

#4 posted 12-08-2015 03:38 AM

I agree – natural is the way to go. (Nice looking desk, BTW.)

-- Howard - "Time spent making sawdust is not deducted from one's lifetime." - old Scottish proverb

View Underdog's profile


878 posts in 1456 days

#5 posted 12-08-2015 03:56 AM

Thanks guys. Natural seems to be the consensus. It’ll be a whole lot less trouble…

-- "woodworker with an asterisk"

View OSU55's profile


1039 posts in 1410 days

#6 posted 12-08-2015 05:29 AM

I like to add a little color to maple to pop the grain. Transtint honey amber with maybe just a drop of brown, or a two step approach dark 1st, sanded back, with honey amber or blonde shellac.

View Knothead62's profile


2581 posts in 2382 days

#7 posted 12-09-2015 07:38 PM

Nice looking desk. I cringe when people paint any kind of wood.

View Tennessee's profile


2410 posts in 1935 days

#8 posted 12-09-2015 10:09 PM

I would add a conditioner to the wood before the final clear finish. The conditioner will even any blotching you might encounter, and give the wood just a hint of warmth that sterile white maple has. It will make it more “butcher block” maple color.

Other than that, no stain or paint.
Just my humble opinion

-- Paul, Tennessee,

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics