LumberJocks

Picture posting

  • Advertise with us

« back to LumberJocks.com Site Feedback forum

Forum topic by GMman posted 10-20-2009 02:12 AM 971 views 0 times favorited 8 replies Add to Favorites Watch
View GMman's profile

GMman

3902 posts in 3162 days


10-20-2009 02:12 AM

Topic tags/keywords: question

Can anyone tell me why we have to transfer a picture to photobucket to post it on LJ instead of copy and paste.


8 replies so far

View Bob #2's profile

Bob #2

3809 posts in 3486 days


#1 posted 10-20-2009 02:57 AM

The websites have to pay for storage if you load images directly to their website.
If you load them to a photo site they only need a link to your picture to have it show up on the site.
It cuts down on disk usage dramatically and also makes tracking you work harder.
It’s what you get for free now days.

Bob

-- A mind, like a home, is furnished by its owner

View a1Jim's profile

a1Jim

115202 posts in 3042 days


#2 posted 10-20-2009 03:04 AM

I wondered about that too.

-- http://artisticwoodstudio.com Custom furniture

View grizzman's profile

grizzman

7798 posts in 2768 days


#3 posted 10-20-2009 03:10 AM

i asked martin myself about a week ago …he told me because of the memory it takes…...so maybe later when were bigger and more revenue is made…then it will change

-- GRIZZMAN ...[''''']

View GMman's profile

GMman

3902 posts in 3162 days


#4 posted 10-20-2009 03:15 AM

I’m fine with that works for me, takes more time but I have all the time in the world!!

Thanks for the answers.

View Roger Clark aka Rex's profile

Roger Clark aka Rex

6940 posts in 2899 days


#5 posted 10-20-2009 03:18 AM

GMman,
It is a way to save space on the LJ server. All the picture files that LJ’s post will require many gigs of storage space and that would slow down our LJ site.
By using a 3rd party to store the pics which we can obatin an HTML insert code for to place pics in our blogs etc., is good way to go if you want our LJ site to be fast.
Yes it would be nice to coy/paste but the disk space overhead required is horrendous and gets worse as more pics accompany our future blogs etc.

-- Roger-R, Republic of Texas. "Always look on the Bright Side of Life" - An eyeball to eyeball confrontation with a blind person is as complete waste of Time.

View GMman's profile

GMman

3902 posts in 3162 days


#6 posted 10-20-2009 03:21 AM

Thanks Roger!

View Martin Sojka's profile

Martin Sojka

1893 posts in 3937 days


#7 posted 10-20-2009 09:51 AM

Quoting my reply on a related topic:

Unlimited picture storage can get expensive. There are many dedicated photo storage / sharing websites that excel in this area. We have limited storage of project and workshop pictures here for free.

mics_54: “I am active on many forums that are as active as this one.”
That’s exactly the main reason to use photo sharing website – upload it once there and then use provided html sharing code snippet on any forum.

To make the process as simple as direct file upload I strongly recommend using MINI-BROWSER that you can find at the bottom of the posting textbox.

Anyways, I’m not saying that LJ will not have a direct photo upload on all posts as an option in the future ;)

View GMman's profile

GMman

3902 posts in 3162 days


#8 posted 10-21-2009 01:43 AM

I get it and I am ok with it!!

Videos I am having problems but I’ll get it after a while.

Have your say...

You must be signed in to reply.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com