LumberJocks

Reply by lwllms

  • Advertise with us

Posted on Short Scrub vs. longer Jack/Fore?

View lwllms's profile

lwllms

535 posts in 1878 days


#1 posted 589 days ago

Now to answer the original post, when preparing stock a scrub plane can often cause problems. Hand “thicknessing” traditionally rendered 7/8” thick stock from 4/4 material. Stock preparation was called “thicknessing” because the goal is to produce true stock to a uniform thickness and that’s the difficult part.

You don’t want to remove too much material from the first or reference face because you won’t have enough thickness left to get the desired end thickness. Stanley or Continental style scrub planes are too aggressive. You’ll actually remove as much stock with a jack or fore plane but the depth of cut isn’t as dramatic. With a jack or fore plane you’re removing material over a wider area and this gives you a more controlled flatting of the face. Control is important here if you want to end up with your material of uniform thickness. Of coarse you could always just start with thicker stock but that costs money and means you have to do a lot more work.

I used to try to justify using a scrub plane by saying it was good for localized problems but my business partner always insisted he wouldn’t want to put material in a project that moved so dramatically that a scrub was required. He’s right, this kind of distortion during drying always means residual stress remains after thicknessing and the material is likely to move again.


DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

GardenTenders.com :: gardening showcase