LumberJocks

Reply by WhoMe

  • Advertise with us

Posted on A convention for the "stars" on the review

View WhoMe's profile

WhoMe

1127 posts in 1998 days


#1 posted 07-28-2012 06:34 PM

I think having a general convention/guideline is a good idea. Like Lumberjoe, I put more stock into the meat of the review but I do look at the number of stars as a “interest point” to see what a reviewer rated something. And, I do feel expectations do have a bearing on the review but it should be minor as that is something that is more emotional. Obviously, if you are buying a top quality product, expectations should be high for a good reason so it would have a bearing on the review but it should be backed up by FACTS and usage of the product.

Like when I go onto Amazon. I almost never look at 1 star or 5 star ratings. To me, the 1 star ratings are based on someone who bought something with no clue in what they were buying or it was a factory defect and the reviewer has not bothered to return it for another and give it a meaningful rating. In that light, to me a 5 star rating means that someone is a ringer (paid to give it 5 stars to feed the purchases) or they bought it and did a “out of the box” review without actually using it.
In my opinion, the most meaningful reviews are the 2 to 4 star reviews. These are almost always more thoughtfully written by someone that has used the product for a while and actually thought about writing the review with pros, cons and any issues they have had.

So here are my guidelines on how I rate things after I have used them several times or more: #1 star= Absolutely no redeeming qualities, pure junk even if I knew it was a cheap tool – has too many factory flaws to be a one off item. —I have never given a item this as I do my research and buy a better product anyway #2 stars= Known lower/bottom quality item. Many flaws in workmanship/ design/ usability. Way more cons than pros. Does not perform as expected even though it was known to be a lesser quality item. Also if item was a better quality item but had all of the above qualities. #3 stars= meet expectation but not more – This would again be based on the price paid/quality and usability of the item reviewed. The item would have as many pros and cons and it basically worked for it’s intended purpose. #4 stars= This was a known better quality product with a good reputation. Has mostly positive usability, quality and price point. Maybe 1 or 2 cons but minor ones at that. This would be a tool that I bought to be used on a frequent basis and it was a better quality manufacturer. #5 stars= I have not given one of these yet. This would be a high quality product with maybe 1 con and a extremely minor one at that. After a month or 2 of use, the product has performed flawlessly and there are no issues with usability.

Anyway, that is how I do it.

-- I'm not clumsy.. It's just the floor hates me, the tables and chairs are bullies and the wall gets in the way.. - Mike -


DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

GardenTenders.com :: gardening showcase