LumberJocks

Reply by thiel

  • Advertise with us

Posted on Original Bailey #21

View thiel's profile

thiel

392 posts in 3437 days


#1 posted 03-22-2011 03:46 AM

”... and then a year, which could read 1882 or might be 1922. Really hard to tell.”

... or I suppose could be “no 22”?

-- Laziness minus Apathy equals Efficiency


DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com