Reply by thiel

  • Advertise with us

Posted on Original Bailey #21

View thiel's profile


394 posts in 3532 days

#1 posted 03-22-2011 03:46 AM

”... and then a year, which could read 1882 or might be 1922. Really hard to tell.”

... or I suppose could be “no 22”?

-- --Thiel

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics