# Geometric Shapes #2: Truncated Icosahedron (without the math)

 Blog entry by rance posted 10-25-2011 04:25 AM 11641 reads 13 times favorited 18 comments
 « Part 1: Geodesic Domes Part 2 of Geometric Shapes series no next part

I am again intrigued by another …hedron shape. Is it an Icoso…, a Dodeca…, or a Tetra…, they are all mumbo jumbo to me. I just want to make one, I don’t want to learn the math. Maybe I should just go buy a Soccer ball and be done with it. Naaaaaaaaw. I want one made of wood.

For the design, my tool of choice is Google SketchUp…..... again. Maybe I cheated, well, I probably did. Sure I did. I went out to ‘3D Warehouse’ and downloaded a soccer ball and proceeded to tear it apart. I removed all the smoothed surfaces and was left with just a few lines. I then rebuilt the surfaces enough to get the angle between the surfaces.

The Truncated Icosahedron is made up of 12 Pentagons and 20 Hexagons. The Pentagons are surrounded on ALL sides by a Hexagon. Thus, the angle of all sides is the same. The Hexagons, however, are surrounded by alternating Pentagons and Hexagons. This means that 3 of its edges are at one angle, and the other three are at another angle.

The angles between the Pentagon and Hexagon are(from my cheating) 37.4 degrees. For a segmentation(which is what this becomes), you take half off of each side. So the Pentagon edges are all cut at 18.7 degrees. Likewise, half of the Hexagon edges are cut at that same 18.7 degrees. The other three edges of the Hexagon are joined to other Hexagons but that angle is 41.8 degrees. Half for each one brings that to an angle of 20.9 degrees.

Next was to rebuild it from scratch, and using those discovered angles, construct my own Soccer Ball. I set an abstract of having the edges at 2” long. With that, I built the two components I needed.

The ‘H’ and ‘P’ notations were indicators to let me know what mating piece would be adjacent to that piece. H for Hexagon, and P for Pentagon(doooooh). With these two components, it was infinitely easier to build them using triangles. Eventually I’ll eliminate those extra lines.

Next was to bend them at my previously discovered angles. Make more copies, then keep bending until I got all 32 pieces in place.

Well, it seems to work with the angles I used. Next will be the manufacture of the actual pieces.

I searched for ‘Icosahedron angles’ on LJ and found Sam and Paul’s works. I’ll be using some of Paul’s techniques for cutting the shapes on the TS. Sam and Paul have both been an inspiration to me with their work. I hope this work here somehow helps someone else in attaining their goals.

- – - – - – - – - -

Update:

And with some judicious rotating, I am able to place a Pentagon at the top(and bottom) and have a straight line in case I want to open it up like a clamshell.

It only takes cutting 5 of the Hexagons in half. Wow, that was easy. I like easy. And with it open…

Or an alternate separation(similar to Paul’s):

.

.

.

[Note: For reference, Sam says “Hexagons have to be cut at 69.2 degrees and pentagons at 75.3 degrees.”.]

-- Backer boards, stop blocks, build oversized, and never buy a hand plane--

## 18 comments so far

 PurpLev8476 posts in 2393 days #1 posted 10-25-2011 04:30 AM just be careful playing with this soccer ball, I’ve heard of tree huggers, but not tree kickers – could be painful. -- ㊍ When in doubt - There is no doubt - Go the safer route. lanwater3098 posts in 1678 days #2 posted 10-25-2011 05:20 AM This guy: http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/1920110has similar finding. His angles and yours are few minutes off. If he is right that could add up… I think Sam has the answer. I sure will be following. -- Abbas, Castro Valley, CA rance4147 posts in 1905 days #3 posted 10-25-2011 06:01 AM lanwater, I agree completely. Thanks for the link. If I’m off, then I’ll know it when I am gluing 85 joints in one swale foop. :) Hey, this is an experiment at this point. If it actually works, THEN I’ll call it a project. :D -- Backer boards, stop blocks, build oversized, and never buy a hand plane-- Mark Shymanski5119 posts in 2457 days #4 posted 10-25-2011 06:16 AM Intriguing…now my brain hurts. Thank you for a captivating post! -- "Checking for square? What madness is this! The cabinet is square because I will it to be so!" Jeremy Greiner LJ Topic#20953 2011 Feb 2 Michael1403 posts in 1404 days #5 posted 10-25-2011 09:17 AM Very creative design. I am anxious to see how the project turns out. Thanks for posting. -- Michael Mills, North Carolina, http://www.scicaskets.com SPalm4930 posts in 2626 days #6 posted 10-25-2011 02:04 PM See, I was right. You are a techno weenie.Nice study.Bugger to build I would think. Thanks,Steve -- -- I'm no rocket surgeon rance4147 posts in 1905 days #7 posted 10-25-2011 06:13 PM You’re probably right Steve. :) I Googled more and found a real Scientific-Looking site(Coolmath.com) that states the mathematically-calculated angles. It looks like I’m just mere minutes away from my final answer. They publish the Dihedral angles as follows: 138 degrees, 11 minutes for the hex-hex angle 142 degrees, 37 minutes for the hex-pent angle So what’s a minute? A minute is 1/60 of a degree. So… (for the Hex – Hex) 11 minutes = 11/60 of a degree, or 0.18333 degrees. And the dihedral is stated from a flat surface. So… 180 – 138.18333 = 41.81667. Divide that by 2 to get the miter angle and I get 20.908335 degrees. I believe my 20.9 degrees agrees with that. Now… (for the Hex – Pent) 37 minutes = 37/60 of a degree, or 0.61667 degrees. And converting from the dihedral, 180 – 142.61667 = 37.38333. Divide that by 2 to get the miter angle and I get 18.691665 degrees. I believe my 18.7 degrees should be fine there too. Of course this all assumes that ‘Coolmath.com’ knows what they are doing. I sure hope so. I trust their math more than my SketchUp. I believe that cutting the pieces out will be simplified using Pauls method on the TS. However, the glue-up could be a bear with 90 joints all at once. One way would be to use the Tape-Hinge method like what I use with mitered boxes. The tape gets it close(if not right on) and the clamps shmooze it into exact position. The key to this is the Net:I got this one from Wikipedia. It is better than most as it centers it all around the base piece. Other ‘Nets’ can be found elsewhere and are typically used when making folded paper models. Lastly, I’m sure a glue with a looooong open time would work best. -- Backer boards, stop blocks, build oversized, and never buy a hand plane-- lanwater3098 posts in 1678 days #8 posted 10-25-2011 07:20 PM Why do you have to glue all at once?That may prove unmanageable Can you just start with a pentagone and add all the surrouding hexagone? That might keep it tight.Once that is done then add more to the first subassembly? I was thinking CA glue for very fast drying time and the glue does not “creep”. For clamping, small paper clips like those: http://www.officedepot.com/a/products/909309/OIC-Mini-Binder-Clips-916-Wide/ Just ideas. -- Abbas, Castro Valley, CA Joe Lyddon7928 posts in 2796 days #9 posted 10-25-2011 07:34 PM Rance, You have done a wonderful job in studying, researching, & great use of SketchUp, to SIMPLIFY a complex (to me anyway) problem! . I LOVE your idea of using the Taping Method, as used for gluing Miter joints, for gluing up your domes!Hinge-type devices could be used for putting larger dome pieces together… (just thinking out loud)... You are doing some GREAT work here… Keep it up! You have peaked my interest again in this geometric subject! Thank you very much! edit:After reviewing Part 1, I realize that you SOLVED the slight ZIG ZAG (bottom) problem! YES?I knew there had to be a way to do it! I’m glad your brain was Up To the task… mine wasn’t… LOL -- Have Fun! Joe Lyddon - Alta Loma, CA USA - Home: http://www.WoodworkStuff.net ... My Small Gallery: http://www.ncwoodworker.net/pp/showgallery.php?ppuser=1389&cat=500" rance4147 posts in 1905 days #10 posted 10-25-2011 10:23 PM lanwater, Yes, it could turn out to be unmanagable. This is one of those situations where any error in gluing one joint becomes accumulative to the next. Actually it almost compounds itself logarithmically. By building something like this all in one glue-up, any slight errors would be schmoozed out as it is pulled together. This would be similar to gluing up an octagonal box, but with a 3rd dimension. The key to a straight Octagon is having the miters cut darned near perfect, and using a band clamp. Gluing up one joint at a time would be analogous to gluing one picture frame joint at a time. When you get to that last corner, any errors from the other 3 would be magnified at the last corner. Of course, in building a separated lid, some of the edges would simply not be glued. This kind of a project SCREAMS for Planning. Something that gets left by the way side with many a project. Hey, I’m talking out the side of my head here. Your suggestion could possibly work just fine. :) One more bizarre solution might be to drill a hole in one segment, apply all the (slow setting)glue, quickly wrap it all up, and apply a vacuum to it. A weightless chamber would come in handy for this method. It would be a hoot if it actually worked. I’d be afraid it’d suck all the glue out of the joints though. -- Backer boards, stop blocks, build oversized, and never buy a hand plane-- Joe Lyddon7928 posts in 2796 days #11 posted 10-26-2011 01:48 AM If you did a Dry Glue-Up using Tape, you could hold off on the glue until you got it Right ahead of time… Then, do another Dry fit up… to be sure… Then, go for it with Glue! Yes? -- Have Fun! Joe Lyddon - Alta Loma, CA USA - Home: http://www.WoodworkStuff.net ... My Small Gallery: http://www.ncwoodworker.net/pp/showgallery.php?ppuser=1389&cat=500" BertFlores581646 posts in 1666 days #12 posted 10-26-2011 04:37 AM Someone made it already…. just recently posted on this project Rance, Thanks for posting this technique… I like to make one of this too! I am planning to use 2 hollow circular jigs clamping the layers of the joint pieces per latitude. But it will be variable circle diameter with the right angle (you already mentioned it above) of radii. Hard to explain… hope I can make it.\ -- Bert Alexey Khasyanov164 posts in 1617 days #13 posted 12-19-2011 09:48 AM Hi, LJ’s! Here is info for You. In One place. -- Rev 22:21 Joe Lyddon7928 posts in 2796 days #14 posted 12-19-2011 07:37 PM That site will put your brain out to lunch! LOL Thank you. -- Have Fun! Joe Lyddon - Alta Loma, CA USA - Home: http://www.WoodworkStuff.net ... My Small Gallery: http://www.ncwoodworker.net/pp/showgallery.php?ppuser=1389&cat=500" waleedwaheed2013138 posts in 629 days #15 posted 03-31-2013 01:50 AM Hi dear , Thanks for your data , Can you tell me How to fixed them by glue. ThanksWaleed -- Waleed Waheed

showing 1 through 15 of 18 comments

## Have your say...

 You must be signed in to post the comments.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

 The bar now 99% complete. 12-09-2014 04:01 AM 2nd bathroom at the cabin 11-23-2014 04:19 PM Outside is almost finished! 11-23-2014 01:48 AM Mail boxes 11-22-2014 09:18 PM Home remodel 2014 11-19-2014 12:31 PM Whole House Humidifier Install 11-16-2014 09:42 PM I guess I'll have a new project to get involved in 10-31-2014 11:00 AM Guy Harvey Outpost In Key West 10-29-2014 06:11 PM Key west Islander 10-29-2014 05:49 PM Cat Door 10-29-2014 04:29 PM Garden Church Planter, succulents 11-29-2014 09:29 AM Wall planter 11-28-2014 08:34 AM Come dance with me 11-20-2014 08:14 AM Cedar Planter Box 11-15-2014 07:10 AM ESPALIER 10-10-2014 12:09 AM Green Chillies 10-09-2014 12:16 AM Bee - Cottage.... 09-06-2014 02:14 PM Stone Staircase 08-31-2014 02:45 AM pond house 08-21-2014 06:55 AM enclosed, raised bed, herb garden 08-05-2014 01:04 AM