<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>CharlieM1958's Blog at LumberJocks.com</title>
    <link>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Inlay Banding Tips</title>
      <link>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/6988</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>I just thought I&#8217;d share a few things I&#8217;ve learned about installing inlay banding. Everything I&#8217;m going to say will be pretty elementary to most, but might be helpful to some who haven&#8217;t tackled this technique yet. Here is a closeup of one of the corners of my recently posted chess table project:</p>


	<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3530/3176746019_1d8805566c_o.jpg" alt="" /></p>


	<p>The easiest way to install banding on a mitered frame like this is to do it on the individual pieces before the frame is glued up. Once I had the four sides roughly cut to size, but before mitering the ends, I cut the channels in each piece to accept the inlay. You can either do this on the router table, or, as I did in this case, on the table saw. Your method will most likely be determined by the width of banding you are inlaying. Since this one is only about 1 and 1/2 the width of a saw kerf, I thought the TS would be easiest.</p>


	<p>The main thing to remember at this point is to set the fence for the first cut, and then cut a groove on all four pieces before moving the fence a smidgeon to widen the channel to the proper measurement. Then recut all four pieces and you&#8217;re ready to glue the banding in.</p>


	<p>(<strong>Note</strong>: Most instructions I&#8217;ve seen tell you to cut your groove a bit shallower than the thickness of the banding so that it will sit a little proud of the surface. Then you can sand the banding down flush. I have found that it is very easy to sand all the way through the banding when doing this, so I prefer to cut the channel deep enough so that the banding is just slightly recessed, then come back and sand the entire surface down until everything is flush. This is somewhat more time-consuming, but you are a lot less likely to make a big mistake.)</p>


	<p>A very thin bead of glue will suffice to hold the banding in place. Once it has dried, you can proceed to cut the miters. If you followed the instructions about cutting the groove in all four pieces before moving the fence, you should find that your banding meets up perfectly at the corners.</p>


	<p>If you are a real perfectionist, you can miter the sides <strong>before</strong> installing the banding. That way, you could take the time to line up the banding so that the pattern match will be identical on all four corners. Personally, I&#8217;m just not that picky (which is why I&#8217;ll never be a real master woodworker).</p>


	<p>Another note: If you want to install an inlay band in a rectangular pattern on a non-mitered surface as I did in the photo below, the best way I&#8217;ve found is to use the router table with stop blocks, then a sharp chisel to square the corners.</p>


	<p><img src="http://lumberjocks.com/assets/pictures/projects/17712.jpg" alt="" /></p>


	<p>Now in case you are wondering about the plain bands of maple and walnut around the chess board, those are not inlays at all, but actually a frame-inside-a-frame. I first glued up the three thin strips into a single piece, then miterd the corners and glued them to the board before moving on to the main walnut frame.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/6988</guid>
      <author>CharlieM1958</author>
      <dc:creator>CharlieM1958</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Office Table in Place</title>
      <link>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/4969</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t want to repost the project, but someone mentioned that they&#8217;d like to see this little table in its intended setting, so here it is.</p>


	<p>The image of St. Louis Cathedral visible in the first photo reflects one of my other hobbies: photography. I took this back in April and had a 24&#215;36 enlargement made.</p>


	<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3189/2587708330_2b724dc318.jpg?v=0" alt="" /></p>


	<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3066/2587752626_2819e8c018.jpg?v=0" alt="" /></p>


	<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2411/2586872557_1f1b8097b0.jpg?v=0" alt="" /></p>


	<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3077/2586874813_449fe102d2.jpg?v=0" alt="" /></p>


	<p>By the way, the chair in the foreground was rescued from my neighbor&#8217;s trash. The only thing wrong with it were numerous superficial nicks and scratches that were easily touched up.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:11:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/4969</guid>
      <author>CharlieM1958</author>
      <dc:creator>CharlieM1958</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interesting Find</title>
      <link>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/3536</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Some of you may have noticed, I purchase wood (among other things) on eBay from tme to time.</p>


	<p>I was intrigued by this lot of inlay banding that the seller claimed to have purchased at an estate sale in Canada. It was still wrapped in its original packaging, complete with shipping label and C.O.D. sticker in the amount of $16.62 (Canadian) from the now-defunct T. Eaton Company. The seller thought the date was September of 1959, but I can&#8217;t really tell for sure. It is obviously very old. The original packaging was open, and presumably some of the inlay had been used. It was advertised as about 35 pieces (3&#8217; long). When I unwrapped it, there were actually over 50 pieces. The bands were thinner than I had judged from the photo on eBay&#8230; they range in width from 3/32&#8221; up to 1/4&#8221;.</p>


	<p>What amazes me is the fine detail in these. I&#8217;ve used inlay banding before, but this appears to be far superior in detail and quality to anything I&#8217;ve purchased previously. The photos don&#8217;t really do them justice. In case you are wondering, my winning bid was $58.01.</p>


	<p>If anybody has any background info that would shed more light on the history of these, I&#8217;d love to hear it. I&#8217;m looking forward to working these into future projects.</p>


	<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2085/2269283123_aa5f26754b.jpg?v=0" alt="" /></p>


	<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2285/2270074314_8bee7f0d98.jpg?v=0" alt="" /></p>


	<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2369/2269283669_cba5fccf61.jpg?v=0" alt="" /></p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:49:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/3536</guid>
      <author>CharlieM1958</author>
      <dc:creator>CharlieM1958</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inlay Blog Challenge</title>
      <link>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/3257</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Once again this morning, I visit the LJ website to see what new projects have been posted, and I run smack dab into some spectacular woodworking. What cought my eye in particular today was this great inlay work on chests posted by bmgdad. Great work!</p>


	<p><img src="http://lumberjocks.com/assets/pictures/projects/17454-196x130.jpg?1201228225" alt="" /></p>


	<p>I&#8217;ve done some straight-line inlay work, but I&#8217;ve really wanted to get into the sort of thing shown here. So my challenge is this: Would one of you guys (or gals) who is good at this sort of thing be willing to photograph the whole process on a similar project and take us through it step by step in a blog?</p>


	<p>If there are no takers, could anyone at least point me to a blog or video somewhere on the internet that might be what I&#8217;m looking for? I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m not the only jock who would be interested.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/3257</guid>
      <author>CharlieM1958</author>
      <dc:creator>CharlieM1958</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Posted better shop photos</title>
      <link>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/3160</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Okay, when I finally got around to posting shop details (while I was at work today), I just threw up some project photos I had on the office computer that just happened to show parts of my humble little shop. But the weren&#8217;t really <strong>of</strong> the shop. So I snapped a few just now to give a little more accurate sense of the miserable conditions I&#8217;m forced to work under. &lt;g></p>


	<p>Anyway, you can see them<a href="http://lumberjocks.com/jocks/CharlieM1958/workshop"> here</a>.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:45:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lumberjocks.com/CharlieM1958/blog/3160</guid>
      <author>CharlieM1958</author>
      <dc:creator>CharlieM1958</dc:creator>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
