Thanks in large part to WhatTheChuck, I’m giving serious thought to changing the design of the underbody of the table. With all due respect to Schroeder's table, which I prefer the looks of in many ways, I think the lack of a footrest underneath is a good thing, and the spindles underneath are magnificent, yet kind of a waste of time, energy, effort, and lumber as they’ll be hidden by chairs. I think the trestle-style design might be more pragmatic, and still embody the simplicity and elegance that I’m striving for. It looks like I’ll still be making the Rodel chairs, which I guess in some way completes the set (but without the fillers in the back splat).
Cool video of Kevin Rodel making the back splat of his chair on Finewoodworking.com
-- You can't control the wind, but you can trim your sails

























2 comments so far
gizmodyne
home | projects | blog
1670 posts in 983 days
posted 94 days ago
I think both designs are interesting. I don’t think that the long rail functions as a footrest. You can’t even reach it with your feet on mine. Also, you can sit eight easily at my Stickey Table
-- -John "Do I have to keep typing a smiley? Just assume it's a joke." www.flickr.com/photos/gizmodyne
a1Jim
home | projects | blog
16671 posts in 470 days
posted 94 days ago
I prefer the trestle style also.
-- Jim from Heirloom Woodshop Southern Oregon