Shopmade Jointer #2: Getting the motor and cutterhead from Ryobi AP13AK Thicknesser

  • Advertise with us
Blog entry by Armand posted 09-30-2011 07:42 AM 24311 reads 1 time favorited 8 comments Add to Favorites Watch
« Part 1: The Plan Part 2 of Shopmade Jointer series Part 3: Finally, I have a Jointer. »

Proceeding with the jointer build. Before i started disintegrating all the parts of the thicknesser, I tested it first a few times and there was no snipe and other issues pertaining to its function, the machine was still in its prestine condition. Momentarily I hesitated to tear it down but i have to build this Jointer out from this machine. The only objective of demolishing this valuable machine is just to get the essential parts for the Jointer, the motor and the cutterhead.

1. The Ryobi AP13AK without the top and side covers. This machine is solidly built and very heavy but it took me only a few minutes to expose the innards.

I then begun taking out the in-feed roller and the anti-kickback pawls so i can gain access to the screws holding the motor.

2. This is the left side showing the chains and sprockets that drives the feed rollers.

3. The main body without the motor and cutter head assembly.

4. The motor separated from the cutterhead housing.

5. The main motor. It took me a while thinking how to remove the plastic cover because even after removing two screws, the cover still won’t go. I finally decided to use my utility cutter to split the sticker that might be hiding the locking mechanism. I was right, after slitting the sticker the left cover just fell off by its own.

6. The motor without the plastic covering the gear box and the electrical wiring taken apart from the housing.

7. For 3 consecutive days I didn’t progress with this demolition coz i can’t remove the retaining rings for the bearings at both ends of the cutterhead. I don’t have the tool for it so i had to bring it somewhere where someone can do it for me.

And there they are, all necessary parts taken out from a good thicknesser. The motor and the cutterhead. There’s just a minor problem here, the sizes of the shaft at each end are different. No wonder the bearings in the picture are not same in size too. This would mean that the two pillowblocks that i’m going to use will be in different sizes. I’ll just need to put a thick shim under the smaller pillowblock to level with the bigger one., putting all these together into a frame to become a Jointer.

-- My Master is Mankind's Greatest Carpenter.

8 comments so far

View firehouse's profile


45 posts in 2785 days

#1 posted 09-30-2011 08:00 AM


-- duke 66 ocala fl.

View BertFlores58's profile (online now)


1697 posts in 2916 days

#2 posted 09-30-2011 09:40 AM

Armand, Ingat (Take care) 2000W Motor is nearly 3 HP. Strong enough to joint. Looking forward. Thanks

-- Bert

View Armand's profile


232 posts in 2904 days

#3 posted 09-30-2011 12:58 PM

Thanks for reminding Bert.

-- My Master is Mankind's Greatest Carpenter.

View patron's profile


13603 posts in 3334 days

#4 posted 09-30-2011 01:15 PM

a new twist on an old quest

taking things apart that work fine

and making something
that works even better

glad you found the bearing sizes out

will make it easier to proceed

looking forward to what you come up with

and think of all the spare parts you will have
that you don’t have to worry about

-- david - only thru kindness can this world be whole . If we don't succeed we run the risk of failure. Dan Quayle

View ratchet's profile


1391 posts in 3780 days

#5 posted 09-30-2011 02:00 PM

Dude, you are my new gadgetry wizard engineering hero. I look forward to future installments.

View EMVarona's profile


437 posts in 2829 days

#6 posted 09-30-2011 11:44 PM

Still following developments. This is getting to be more and more interesting. Looks like a table top offset duplicating machine I am familiar with. Keep posting. That machine looks new. Wonder why you decided to knock it down.

-- Ed "Real happiness is one that you share."

View JRL's profile


104 posts in 2532 days

#7 posted 10-01-2011 01:21 AM

I had that same curious thought—why cannibalize a perfectly good machine? My guess is that in the bean counting, the loss of a low-end thicknesser far outweighs the cost of a new jointer? Am I in the ballpark with this guess?

-- Jay in Changsha

View BritBoxmaker's profile


4611 posts in 3030 days

#8 posted 10-02-2011 10:30 PM

Very interesting, Armand. I look forward to the next instalment.

-- Martyn -- Boxologist, Pattern Juggler and Candyman of the visually challenging.

Have your say...

You must be signed in to post the comments.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics